Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

Additive technologies in spinal personalized surgery (experimental study)

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-2-83-88

I.A. Dotsenko1, V.V. Kotomtsev2, I.D. Medvinskiy1,3, A.V. Savel’ev1, M.A. Botov4

1Ural Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology — Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

2Institute of Immunology and Physiology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

3Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

4The First Russian President B.N. Yeltsin Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Aim: to compare two techniques of the fixation of spinal motion segments in experimental animals with thoracic vertebral fracture/luxation.

Patients and Methods: 10 animals (dogs) were included in the study group. These animals underwent spinal motion segment fixation by experimental technique using personalized titan plates with the individual shape of the surface adjacent to bone and integrated navigation system (apertures with pre-calculated tilt angle for minimally invasive screw fixation). Titan plates were manufactured preoperatively by a 3D printer technique using additive technologies depending on the anatomy of spinal motion segment of the experimental animal based on the primary computed tomography DICOM imaging. 10 dogs with similar injury which underwent traditional surgery (spinal motion segment fixation using transpedicular screws) were included in the study group.

Results: the groups were matched by the mechanism and level (lower thoracic spine) of the i njury with similar consequences (thoracic vertebral fracture/luxation), age (on average, 3.5 years, 95% CI 2.8–4.2) and weight (on average, 32.4 kg, 95% CI 29.3–35.5) of experimental animals. Postoperatively, the improvement of neurological deficiency and the lack of significant inflammation were reported in the study group. This technique prevents spinal canal perforation when placing screws, reduces intraoperative surgeon and patient radiation exposure, improves the stability of spinal segment fixation, and avoids screw fractures.

Conclusion: this novel technique is a promising surgical modality to manage human spinal motion segment damage of various origin.

Keywords: additive technologies, computed tomography, spinal injuries, preclinical studies, minimally invasive surgery.

For citation: Dotsenko I.A., Kotomtsev V.V., Medvinskiy I.D. et al. Additive technologies in spinal personalized surgery (experimental study). Russian Medical Review. 2020;4(2):83–88. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-2-83-88.

About the authors:

1Ivan A. Dotsenko — MD, researcher, neurosurgeon, ORCID iD 0000-0002-1897-5274;

2Vyacheslav V. Kotomtsev — MD, PhD, Professor, leading researcher of the Laboratory of Immunophysiology and Immunopharmacology ORCID iD 0000-0001-5232-9244;

1,3 Igor Medvinskiy — MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Division, professor of the Department of Phthisiopulmonology, ORCID iD 0000-0002-3064-4865;

1Aleksandr V. Savel’ev — MD, PhD, senior researcher, Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, ORCID iD 0000-0001-8100-625X;

4Mikhail A. Botov — senior lecturer of the Department of Mathematics ORCID iD 0000-0002-1157-6895.

1Ural Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology — Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases. 50, 22nd Parts’ezd str., Ekaterinburg, 620039, Russian Federation.

2Institute of Immunology and Physiology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 106, Pervomaiskaya str., Ekaterinburg, 620049, Russian Federation.

3Ural State Medical University. 3, Repin str., Ekaterinburg, 620028, Russian Federation.

4The First Russian President B.N. Yeltsin Ural Federal 
University. 19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation.

Contact information: Igor Medvinskiy, e-mail: 2134012@gmail.com. Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned. There is no conflict of interests. Received 26.02.2020.

References
1. Surgical treatment of osteoarticular tuberculosis / Ed. Yu.N. Levasheva, A.Yu. Mushkina. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology; 2008 (in Russ.).
2. Burlakov S.V., Oleinik V.V., Vishnevsky A.A. The effect of the duration of tuberculous spondylitis on the development of complications. . Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2013;1: 61–66.
3. Burlakov S.V., Vishnevsky A.A. Ineffective one-stage surgical treatment of common tuberculous spondylitis: a clinical case and literature review. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2018;15(1):71–78.
4. Kuklin D.V., Belyakov M.V., Serdobintsev M.S., Dorofeev L.A. The tactics of using titanium implants for tuberculous spondylitis, depending on the sagittal profile of the spine. Tuberculosis and lung disease. 2015;7:81.
5. Traumatology: national guidlines / Ed. G.P. Kotelnikova, S.P. Mironova. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2011.
6. Perlmutter O.A. Injury to the spine and spinal cord. N. Novgorod: Publishing House of the Nizhny Novgorod State Medical Academy; 2016.
7. Assaghir Y.M., Refae H.H., Alam-Eddin M. Anterior versus posterior debridement fusion for single-level dorsal tuberculosis: the role of graft-type and level of fixation on determining the outcome. Eur. Spine J. 2016;25:3884–3893. DOI: 10.1007/ s00586-016-4516-2.
8. Ba Z.Y., Pan F.M., Huang Y.F. et al. One-stage anterior radical debridement and reconstruction with titanium mesh combined with antituberculosis for cervical spinal tuberculosis: 5–13 years follow up. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016;9:6368–6372.
9. Liu C., Lin L., Wang W. et al. Long-term outcomes of vertebral column resection for kyphosis in patients with cured spinal tuberculosis: average 8-year follow-up. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2016;24:777–785. DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15534.
10. Kaneyama S., Sugawara T., Sumi М. et al. A novel screw guiding method with a screw guide template system for posterior C2 fixation: clinical article. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2014;21:231–238. DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13730.
11. Liu Z., Wang X.Y., Xu Z.Q. et al. Two approaches for treating upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficits in the elderly: A retrospective case-control study. Clin. Neurolog. Neurosurg. 2016;141:111–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.002.
12. Ran B., Xie Y.L., Yan L., Cai L. One-stage surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis by transpedicular fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach. J. Huazhong. Univ. Sci Technolog. Med. Sci. 2016;36:541–547. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1622-7.
13. Sugawara T., Kaneyama S., Higashiyama N. et al. Prospective Multicenter Study of a Multistep Screw Insertion Technique Using Patient-Specific Screw Guide Templates for the Cervical and Thoracic Spine. SPINE;43(23):1685–1694. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002810.
14. Radermacher K., Portheine F., Anton M. et al. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin. Orthop.Relat. Res. 1998;354:28–38.
15. Yang H.D., Hou K.D., Zhang L. et al. Minimally invasive surgery through the interlaminar approach in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: A retrospective study of 31 patients. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016;32:9–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.036.
16. Zhang P.H., Peng W., Wang X.Y. et al. Minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes for single-stage transpedicular debridement, posterior instrumentation and fusion in the management of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults. Br. J.Neurosurg. 2016;30:666–671. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1206182.
17. Kaneyama S., Sugawara T., Sumi M. et al. A novel screw guiding method with a screw guide template system for posterior C2 fixation: clinical article. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2014;21:231–238. DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13730.
18. Mobbs R.J., Coughlan M., Thompson R. et al. The utility of 3D printing for surgical planning and patient-specific implant design for complex spinal pathologies: case report. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2017;26:513–518. DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16371.
19. Radermacher K., Portheine F., Anton M. et al. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin. Orthop.Relat. Res. 1998;354:28–38.

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article