Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

Prevention and treatment of enteroparesis in children

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2618-8430-2022-5-4-373-381

O.S. Pen’tkovskaya1, S.I. Bardenikova2

1St. Vladimir Children’s City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation

2A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian Federation


Dynamic intestinal obstruction (DIO) is one of the disorders reported after gastrointestinal (GI) surgical procedures. DIO raises special concerns, as it affects patients’ condition in the postoperative period and increases the duration of hospital treatment. The review section of the article is focused on DIO pathogenetic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and treatment strategies. In addition to diet therapy and the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, the conservative therapy in children includes various physiotherapy treatment techniques, facilitating intestinal motility. The comparative analysis shows that their ultimate efficiency is not the same and that there are significant limitations and differences associated with the access to the optimal areas for electrode placement. The article presents the results of introducing an original technique of dynamic electrical stimulation of the intestine with point paravertebral massage which wa s used in the early postoperative period for 117 children. The children had undergone either emergency surgeries in cases of acute surgical conditions or planned (stage-by-stage) intestinal reconstruction surgeries for preventing DIO.The data have demonstrated the efficacy of electrical stimulation used both as monotherapy and in combination with proserine (the number of required injections was decreased to 1 or 2). Restoration of the intestinal passage was achieved in 95% of cases within the first 24–36 hours after surgery (spontaneous defecation occurred in 70% of patients by the end of the first day). A later response to electrical stimulation with the restoration of peristalsis was determined after small intestine surgeries: spontaneous emptying of the intestine on the first day occurred only in 43% of children versus 52% after surgery of the lower portion of the abdominal cavity

Keywords: postoperative intestinal paresis; children; clinical course; diagnostics; electrical stimulation; original technique; acupressure device.

For citation: Pen’tkovskaya O.S., Bardenikova S.I. Prevention and treatment of enteroparesis in children. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health. 2022;5(4):373–381 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2618-8430-2022-5-4-373-381.


About the authors:

Olga S. Pen’tkovskaya — pediatrician, physiotherapist, Head of the Department of Physiotherapy and Therapeutic Exercise, St. Vladimir Children’s City Clinical Hospital; 1/3, Rubtsovsko-Dvortsovaya str., Moscow, 107014, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-8664-4792.

Svetlana I. Bardenikova — C. Sc. (Med.), associate professor of the Department of Pediatrics, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-3428-0843.

Contact information: Svetlana I. Bardenikova, e-mail: s_bard@bk.ru.

Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned.

There is no conflict of interests.

Received 19.08.2022.

Revised 13.09.2022.

Accepted 06.10.2022.


References
1. Galperin Yu.M. Paresis, paralysis and functional intestinal obstruction. M: Meditsina; 1975 (in Russ.).
2. Cherpak B.D. Prevention and treatment of postoperative paresis and paralysis of the alimentary canal: thesis. Kyiv; 1988 (in Russ.).
3. Baker L.W., Webster D.R. Postoperative intestinal motility. An experimental study on dogs. Br J Surg. 1968;55(5):374–378. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800550511.
4. Klimov P.K. Functional relationships in the digestive system. L.: Nauka; 1976 (in Russ.).
5. Kalff J.C., Schraut W.H., Simmons R.L., Bauer A.J. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg. 1998;228(5):652–663. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199811000-00004.
6. Mason R.J., Lipham J., Eckerling G. et al. Gastric electrical stimulation: an alternative surgical therapy for patients with gastroparesis. Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):841–846; discussion 847–848. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.841.
7. Schwarz N.T., Beer-Stolz D., Simmons R.L., Bauer A.J. Pathogenesis of paralytic ileus: intestinal manipulation opens a transient pathway between the intestinal lumen and the leukocytic infiltrate of the jejunal muscularis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(1):31–40. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00005.
8. Böhm B., Milsom J.W., Fazio V.W. Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg. 1995;130(4):415–419. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040077017.
9. Taché Y., Mönnikes H., Bonaz B., Rivier J. Role of CRF in stress-related alterations of gastric and colonic motor function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;697:233–243. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb49936.x.
10. Harnsberger C.R., Maykel J.A., Alavi K. Postoperative Ileus. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(3):166–170. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677003.
11. Condon R.E., Frantzides C.T., Cowles V.E. et al. Resolution of postoperative ileus in humans. Ann Surg. 1986;203(5):574–581. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198605000-00019.
12. García-Caballero M., Vara-Thorbeck C. The evolution of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparative study with conventional cholecystectomy and sympathetic blockade treatment. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(5):416–419. DOI: 10.1007/BF00311733.
13. Mythen M.G. Postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):196–204. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000139376.45591.17.
14. Gain Yu.M., Leonovich S.I., Alekseev S.A. Enteral insufficiency in peritonitis: theoretical and practical aspects, diagnosis and treatment. Minsk: Molodechno; 2001 (in Russ.).
15. Deitch E.A. Bacterial translocation: the influence of dietary variables. Gut. 1994;35(1 Suppl):S23–27. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s23.
16. De Winter B.Y., Boeckxstaens G.E., De Man J.G. et al. Effect of adrenergic and nitrergic blockade on experimental ileus in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120(3):464–468. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700913.
17. Ponomareva A.P., Belmer S.V., Kovalenko A.A. Electromyographic evaluation of gastrointestinal motility in pediatrics. In: Materials of the X Congress of Pediatric Gastroenterologists of Russia. M.; 2003:74. (in Russ.).
18. Ovechkin A.M. Postoperative pain: the state of problem and current trends in postoperative analgesia. Regionarnaya anesteziya i lechenie boli. 2015;9(2):29–39 (in Russ.).
19. Segelman J., Nygren J. Evidence or eminence in abdominal surgery: recent improvements in perioperative care. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(44):16615–16619. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16615.
20. Khazina L.V. Theoretical and practical bases of structural-resonance therapy. Medicine and high technology. 2015;2:32–38 (in Russ.).
21. Evseev M.A., Fomin V.S., Vladykin A.L. et al. Сomplex conservative treatment of gastrointestinal paresis after major abdominal surgery. Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;23(3):188–195 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18821/1560-9502-2018-23-3-188-195.
22. Galligan J.J., Furness J.B., Costa M. Migration of the myoelectric complex after interruption of the myenteric plexus: intestinal transection and regeneration of enteric nerves in the guinea pig. Gastroenterology. 1989;97(5):1135–1146. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91683-1.
23. Panchenkov D.N., Leonov S.D., Rodin A.V. Bioimpedance analysis in medicine. Pathological physiology and experimental therapy. 2014;58(2):80–86 (in Russ.).
24. Gribkov Yu.I., Urbanovich A.S. Early diagnosis and treatment of postoperative paresis of the gastrointestinal tract. Khirurgiya. 1992;2:120–123 (in Russ.).
25. Sinenchenko G.I., Verbitsky V.G., Kolunov A.V. Endolymphatic infusion of serotonin adipate in the treatment of postoperative intestinal paresis. Meditsinskiy vestnik MVD. 2006;2(21):21–23 (in Russ.).
26. Biryaltsev V.N., Berdnikov A.V., Filippov V.A., Veliyev N.A. Electrogastroenterography in surgical gastroenterology. Kazan; 2003 (in Russ.).
27. Revin G.O. Motor function of the colon after stem vagotomy with pyloroplasty: thesis. St. Petersburg; 2003 (in Russ.).
28. Matheus N., Mendoza C., Iceta R. et al. Regulation of serotonin transporter activity by adenosine in intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78(9):1198–1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.06.006.
29. Kurygin A.A., Stojko Yu.M., Bagnenko S.F. Urgent surgical gastroenterology: a guide for physicians. SPb.: Piter. 2001 (in Russ.).
30. Bauer A.J., Boeckxstaens G.E. Mechanisms of postoperative ileus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 2:54–60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-3150.2004.00558.x.
31. Van Leeuwen P.A., Boermeester M.A., Houdijk A.P. et al. Clinical significance of translocation. Gut. 1994;35(1 Suppl):S28–34. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s28.
32. Faiz O., Blackburn S.C., Clark J. et al. Laparoscopic and conventional appendicectomy in children: outcomes in English hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(11):1223–1227. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2247-0.
33. Grinberg Ya.Z. SCENAR: construction, physical mechanisms, bases of efficiency. Nelekarstvennaya meditsina. 2006;3(4):37–42 (in Russ.).
34. Revenko A.N. SKENAR terapiya. Ekaterinburg: Filantrop; 2005:7–10, 26–27, 44–46 (in Russ.).

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article