Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-4-243-246

S.A. Karpishchenko1,2, G.V. Lavrenova2, O.E. Vereshchagina2, P.I. Gas’kova2

1St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose, and Speech, St. Petersburg,
 Russian Federation

2I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

This review article attempts to systematize and summarize the data on the major age-related pathophysiological, biomechanical, and histological processes that contribute to the progression of nasal breathing impairment or the appearance of these symptoms in elderly patients. The specifics of risk assessment of deviated septum surgery using various questionnaires and scoring systems is discussed. The article demonstrates that deviated septum surgery can be performed in these patients and addresses the specificity of donor site selection for a septal graft in elderly patients considering the histological features of various septal cartilage regions. Prior assessment of individual risks is of particular importance since it determines surgical success and favorable postoperative course in these patients. Studies addressing the perspective use of tissue-engineering transplants are unraveled. Management strategies that consider aging biomechanisms potentially affecting treatment efficacy are described. Finally, the article highlights pr eoperative management, treatment choice, drug dosage regimens, and postoperative management after septoplasty.

Keywords: deviated septum, septoplasty, elderly persons, age-related disorders, neuromuscular tone, nasal breathing impairment.

For citation: Karpishchenko S.A., Lavrenova G.V., Vereshchagina O.E., Gas’kova P.I. Septoplasty in elderly patients. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2020;4(4):243–246. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-4-243-246.



Особенности септопластики у пациентов старших возрастных групп

About the authors:

Sergey A. Karpishchenko — Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director, St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose, and Speech, 9, Bronnitskaya str., St. Petersburg, 198013, Russian Federation;  Head of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6–8, Lev Tolstoy str., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0003-1124-1937.

Galina V. Lavrenova — Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6–8, Lev Tolstoy str., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-3537-0226.

Olga E. Vereshchagina — Cand. of. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Otorhinolaryngological Department, I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University. 6–8, Lev Tolstoy str., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-9480-6547.

Polina I. Gas’kova — student of the 5th course of the Medical Faculty, I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6–8, Lev Tolstoy str., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-8733-6524.


Contact information: Olga E. Vereshchagina, e-mail: wereschagina@yandex.ru. Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned. There is no conflict of interests. Received 31.06.2020, revised 13.07.2020, accepted 27.07.2020.

References
1. Van Egmond M.M., Rovers M.M., Hendriks C.T., van Heerbeek N. Effectiveness of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:500. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-1031-4.
2. Rotter N., Tobias G., Lebl M. et al. Age-relatedchanges in the composition and mechanicalproperties of human nasal cartilage. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;403(1):132–140. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9861 (02) 00263-1.
3. Rotter N., Bonassar L.J., Tobias G. et al. Age dependence of biochemical andbiomechanical properties of tissue-engineeredhuman septal cartilage. Biomaterials. 2002;23(15):3087–3094. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612 (02) 00031-5.
4. Vetter U., PirsigW., Helbing G. et al. Patterns of growth in human septal cartilage: a review of new approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;7(1):63–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-5876 (84) 80054-3.
5. Vetter U., Pirsig W, Heinze E. Growth activity in human septal cartilage: age-dependent incorporation of labeled sulfate in different anatomic locations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(2):167–171. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198302000-00001.
6. Vetter U., Heit W., Helbing G. et al. Growth of the human septal cartilage: cell density and colony formation of septalchondrocytes. Laryngoscope. 1984;94(9):1226–1229. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198409000-00016.
7. Rotter N., Aigner J., Naumann A. et al. Cartilagereconstruction in head and neck surgery: comparison of resorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering of human septal cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42(3):347–356. DOI: 10.1002/ (SICI) 1097-4636 (19981205) 42:3<347:: AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J.
8. Chia S.H., Schumacher B.L., Klein T.J. et al. Tissue-engineered human nasal septal cartilageusing the alginate-recovered-chondrocytemethod. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(1):38–45. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200401000-00006.
9. Haisch A., Duda G.N., Schroeder D. et al. Themorphology and biomechanical characteristics ofsubcutaneously implanted tissue-engineeredhuman septal cartilage. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2005;262(12):993–997. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-0935-0.
10. Christophel J.J., Chang J.S., Park S.S. Transplantedtissue-engineered cartilage. Arch Facial Plast. Surg. 2006;8(2):117–122. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.8.2.117.
11. Al Suliman Y., Valdes C.J., Tewfik M.A. Sinonasal Disorders in Elderly Patients. Curr Otorhinolaryngol. Rep. 2020;8:50–54. DOI: 10.1007/s40136-020-00274-x.
12. Grymer L., Rosborg J. The aging nose: Long-term results following plastic septal surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1987;101(4):363–365. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215100101793.
13. Patterson C.N. The aging nose: characteristics and correction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1980;13(2):275–288. DOI: 10.1016/S0030-6665 (20) 32367-7.
14. Lee J.W., McHugh J., Kim J.C. et al. Age-Related Histologic Changes in Human Nasal Cartilage. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(4):256–262. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.825.
15. Habesoglu M., Kilic O., Caypinar B., Onder S. Aging as the Impact Factor on Septoplasty Success. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(5):e419–e422. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001879.
16. Shiryaeva O., Tarangen M., Gay C. et al. Preoperative Signs and Symptoms as Prognostic Markers in Nasal Septoplasty. Int J Otolaryngol. 2017;2017:4718108. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4718108.
17. Baumann I. Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:Doc06.
18. Hytönen M.L., Lilja M., Mäkitie A.A. et al. Does septoplasty enhance the quality of life in patients? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:2497–2503. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-1931-9.
19. Becker S.S., Dobratz E.J., Stowell N. et al. Revision Septoplasty: Review of Sources of Persistent Nasal Obstruction. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(4):440–444. DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3200.
20. Serifoglu I., Oz İ.İ., Damar M. et al. Relationship between the degree and direction of nasal septum deviation and nasal bone morphology. Head Face Med. 2017;13:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-017-0136-2.
21. Rainsbury J.W. The place of rhinoplasty in the ageing face. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124(2):115–118. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215109990892.
22. Busaba N.Y., Hossain, M. Clinical Outcomes of Septoplasty and Inferior Turbinate Reduction in the Geriatric Veterans’ Population. Am J Rhinol. 2004;18(6):343–347. DOI: 10.1177/194589240401800601.
23. Buckland J.R., Thomas S., Harries P.G. Can the Sino-nasal Outcome (SNOT-22) be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol. 2003;28:43–47. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00663.x.
24. Карпищенко С.А., Верещагина О.Е., Станчева О.А. Последствия ринологических операций. Follia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2016;22(1):91–94. [Karpishchenko S.A., Vereshchagina O.E., Stancheva O.A. Consequences of rhinological operations. Follia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2016;22(1):91–94 (in Russ.)].
25. Карпищенко С.А., Александров А.Н., Баранская С.В., Фаталиева А.Ф. Коррекция перегородки носа при вмешательствах на верхнечелюстной пазухе. Российская оториноларингология. 2018;2:44–47. [Karpishchenko S.A., Aleksandrov A.N., Baranskaya S.V., Fatalieva A.F. Correction of the nasal septum during interventions in the maxillary sinus. Rossiyskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2018;2:44–47 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18692/1810-4800-2018-2-44-47.
26. Карпищенко С.А., Верещагина О.Е., Фаталиева А.Ф., Карпов А.А. Коррекция перегородки носа при эндоскопической эндоназальной дакриоцисториностомии. Follia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2019;25(4):15–20. [Karpishchenko S.A., Vereshchagina O.E., Fatalieva A.F., Karpov A.A. Correction of the nasal septum in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Follia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2019;25(4):15–20 (in Russ.)].

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article