Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

Cervicalgia in patients with hypermobility syndrome

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2026-10-9-9

Cervicalgia in patients with hypermobility syndrome

D.Kh. Khaibullina1, I.Kh. Khairullin2

1 Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Kazan, Russian Federation

2 ACSOM (American Canadian School of Medicine), Picard-Portsmouth, Commonwealth of Dominica

Background: neck pain (cervicalgia) is common in medical practice, regardless of a health specialty, and it is often associated with connective tissue dysplasia (CTD) and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), especially in women. Despite their prevalence, the comorbidity of these conditions and their impact on pain syndrome are still underinvestigated.

Aim: to investigate characteristics of cervical spine pain syndromes in patients with joint hypermobility.

Materials and Methods: 114 patients (18–60 years old) complaining of neck pain were enrolled. The study group (SG) consisted of 94 individuals (77.7% women, median age: 36.7 years) with JHS, and the control group (CG) consisted of 20 individuals (median age: 40.7 years) without JHS and signs of CTD. Neurological and neuro-orthopedic examinations were performed; hypermobility was assessed using the Beighton score and the Brighton criteria; pain severity, central sensitization, anxiety and depression levels, and quality of life were evaluated.

Results: in the SG, pain onset was earlier (27.6 vs. 37.5 years), and exacerbations were more frequent (up to 3 times per year vs. 1 time per year). According to the VAS, pain intensity was higher (p=0.042), but central sensitization level did not differ. The SG demonstrated mixed headache (cervicogenic + tension-type headache), while isolated tension-type headache was reported in the CG. In patients with CTD, functional blocks were more common in the craniocervical junction (C0-CIII) versus CIV-CV in the control group. A direct correlation was found between CTD severity and incidence of panic attacks and mood disorders (p<0.001) associated with increased central sensitization and decreased quality of life.

Conclusion: in patients with cervicalgia, CTD and JHS are associated with early onset, mixed headache, specific localization of functional blocks, and high incidence of psychoemotional disorders associated with central sensitization. This justifies a need for a multidisciplinary approach involving a neurologist, a chiropractor, and a psychologist to manage patients with cervicalgia and CTD.

Keywords: pain, neck pain, cervicalgia, joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorders, connective tissue dysplasia.

For citation: Khaibullina D.Kh., Khairullin I.Kh. Cervicalgia in patients with hypermobility syndrome. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2026;10(9):652–657 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2026-10-9-9

About the authors:

Dina Kh. Khaibullina — C. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; 36, Butlerov str., Kazan, 420012, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-6883-7649

Ilshat Kh. Khairullin — C. Sc. (Med.), Lecturer, Department of Medicine, American Canadian School of Medicine; Robert Ross blvd., Picard-Portsmouth, St. John's Parish, Commonwealth of Dominica, 00109–8000; ORCID iD 0000-0003-0919-035X

Contact information: Dina Kh. Khaibullina, e-mail: dina.khaibullina@mail.ru

Financial Disclosure: the study was funded by a grant no. 5/2025-PD-KGMA dt 12.22.2025, from the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan to higher education bodies, scientific and other organizations to support qualified staff development plans in terms of stimulating scientific and scientific pedagogical employees to defend their doctorates and to carry out scientific researches.

There is no conflict of interest.

Received 07.09.2026.

Revised 11.09.2026.

Accepted 18.09.2026.

References
1. Wu H., Li Y., Zou C. et al. Global burden of neck pain and its gender and regional inequalities from 1990 — 2021: a comprehensive analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):94. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08331-6
2. Cohen S.P., Hooten W.M. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017;358:j3221. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3221
3. Castori M., Tinkle B., Levy H. et al. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(1):148–157. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31539
4. Nicholson L.L., Simmonds J., Pacey V. et al. International Perspectives on Joint Hypermobility: A Synthesis of Current Science to Guide Clinical and Research Directions. J Clin Rheumatol. 2022;28(6):314–320. DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001864
5. Ituen O.A., Anieto E.M., Ferguson G. et al. Prevalence and Demographic Distribution of Hypermobility in a Random Group of School-Aged Children in Nigeria. Healthcare. 2023;11(8):1092. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081092
6. Aukštuolytė-Bačienė E., Daunoravičienė A., Tamulionytė V. et al. Present but Ignored: Physical Condition and Health-Related Quality of Life in College-Aged Females with Generalized Joint Hypermobility. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(11):1065. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111065
7. Мартынов А.И., Нечаева Г.И. Клинические рекомендации Российского научного медицинского общества терапевтов по диагностике, лечению и реабилитации пациентов с дисплазиями соединительной ткани (первый пересмотр). Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2018;13(1.2):137–209. DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2018.13037. Martynov A., Nechaeva G. Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Patients with Connective Tissue Dysplasia (First Revision). Medical News of North Caucasus. 2018;13(1.2):137–209 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14300/ mnnc.2018.13037
8. Есин О.Р., Горобец Е.А., Хайруллин И.Х. и др. Опросник центральной сенситизации — русскоязычная версия. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2020;120(6):51–56. DOI: 10.17116/ jnevro202012006151. Esin O.R., Gorobets E.A., Khairullin I.Kh. et al. Central Sensitization Inventory — a Russian version. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(6):51–56 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/ jnevro202012006151
9. Spielberger C.D., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene R.E. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
10. Белова А.Н., Щепетова О.Н., ред. Шкалы, тесты и опросники в медицинской реабилитации: Руководство для врачей и научных работников. М.: Антидор; 2002. Belova A.N., Shchepetova O.N., eds. Scales, Tests, and Questionnaires in Medical Rehabilitation: A Guide for Physicians and Researchers. M.: Antidor; 2002 (in Russ.).
11. Кадурина Т.И., Горбунова В.Н. Дисплазия соединительной ткани: руководство для врачей. СПб.: Элби-СПб; 2009. Kadurina T.I., Gorbunova V.N. Connective tissue dysplasia: a guide for physicians. St. Petersburg: ELBI-SPb; 2009 (in Russ.).
12. Remvig L., Jensen D.V., Ward R.C. Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:804–809. PMID: 17407233
13. Bin Abd Razak H.R., Bin Ali N., Howe T.S. Generalized ligamentous laxity may be a predisposing factor for musculoskeletal injuries. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(5):474–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.001
14. Jindal P., Narayan A., Ganesan S., MacDermid J.C. Muscle strength differences in healthy young adults with and without generalized joint hypermobility: a cross-sectional study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2016;8:12. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-016-0037-x
15. Scheper M.C., De Vries J.E., Juul-Kristensen B. et al. The functional consequences of generalized joint hypermobility: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:243. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-243
16. Quatman C.E., Ford K.R., Myer G.D. et al. The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(3):257–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.05.005
17. Nicholson L.L., McKay M.J., Cartwright J. et al. Is there a relationship between sagittal cervical spine mobility and generalised joint hypermobility? A cross-sectional study of 1000 healthy Australians. Physiotherapy. 2021;112:150–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.12.003
18. Graf C., Schierz O., Steinke H. et al. Life Child Study Team. Sex hormones in association with general joint laxity and hypermobility in the temporomandibular joint in adolescents-results of the epidemiologic LIFE child study. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(11):1023–1030. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12834
19. Castori M., Morlino S., Ghibellini G. et al. Connective tissue, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s), and head and cervical pain. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015;169C(1):84–96. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31426
20. Мансуров Д.М., Хайбуллина Д.Х., Бикмуллин Т.А. Структура головных болей у пациентов молодого и среднего возраста с дисплазией соединительной ткани. Практическая медицина. 2024;22(1):92–96. DOI: 10.32000/2072-1757-2024-1-92-96. Mansurov D.M., Khaibullina D.Kh., Bikmullin T.A. Structure of headaches in young and middle-aged patients with connective tissue dysplasia. Practical Medicine. 2024;22(1):92–96 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32000/2072-1757-2024-1-92-96

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article