Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

Artificial intelligence technologies in diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune gastritis

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2026-10-5-7

Artificial intelligence technologies in diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune gastritis

M.A. Livzan1, S.I. Mozgovoy1, O.V. Gaus1, A.V. Gubanova2, A.E. Samotuga3, S.S. Zhumazhanova3

1 Omsk State Medical University, Omsk, Russian Federation

2 City Outpatient Hospital No. 8, Omsk, Russian Federation

3 Omsk State Technical University, Omsk, Russian Federation

The current stage of development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in medicine is characterized by a transition from a general demonstration of AI technical capabilities to development of clinically significant systems focused on solving specific diagnostic tasks and supporting a practitioner in real clinical practice. As for gastroenterology, this is especially evident in endoscopic and morphological data analysis where AI methods have already demonstrated high efficacy in detection of early and pronounced precancerous changes in the gastric mucosa (GM). However, a number of specialized solutions for autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is still limited. The issue is urgent because early accurate diagnosis of autoimmune GM lesions is still complicated in real-world practice due to high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and frequent overlap of clinical and morphological signs of various forms of chronic gastritis. At the same time, most modern AI solutions reported in the literature are focused either on analysis of endoscopic images or on evaluation of morphological specimens. There is limited number of the solutions dedicated to integration of various signs within a single explicable clinical diagnostic model suitable for routine use. The paper demonstrates an analysis of modern AI technology capabilities in AIG-focused diagnosis of chronic gastritis, as well as presentation of the authors' own experience in algorithmization of diagnostic search based on clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and morphological data in patients with various H. pylori infection status.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, chronic gastritis, autoimmune gastritis, Helicobacter pylori, chronic atrophic gastritis, digital pathology, medical decision support system.

For citation: Livzan M.A., Mozgovoy S.I., Gaus O.V., Gubanova A.V., Samotuga A.E., Zhumazhanova S.S. Artificial intelligence technologies in diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune gastritis. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2026;10(5):309–318 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2026-10-5-7

About the authors:

Maria A. Livzan — Corresponding Member of the RAS, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Gastroenterology, Rector of the Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenin str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-6581-7017

Sergey I. Mozgovoy — Dr. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Professor of the Department of Pathological Anatomy, Omsk State University; 12, Lenin str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-7200-7082

Olga V. Gaus — Dr. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Professor of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Gastroenterology, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenin str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-9370-4768

Anastasia V. Gubanova — C. Sc. (Med.), Gastroenterologist, City Outpatient Hospital No. 8; 10, Bagration str., Omsk, 644052, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-5989-6804

Alexander E. Samotuga — C. Sc. (Tech.), Assistant Professor of the Department of Integrated Information Security, Omsk State Technical University; 11, Mira ave., Omsk, 644050, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-5647-7498

Samal S. Zhumazhanova — C. Sc. (Tech.), Assistant Professor of the Department of Integrated Information Security, Omsk State Technical University; 11, Mira ave., Omsk, 644050, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-6785-5201

Contact information: Olga V. Gaus, e-mail: gaus_olga@bk.ru

Financial Disclosure: the paper was supported by RSF (project No. 26-15-20051).

There is no conflict of interest.

Received 10.04.2026.

Revised 27.04.2026.

Accepted 19.05.2026.

References
1. Rugge M., Genta R.M., Malfertheiner P. et al. RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative-updating the updates. Gut. 2024;73(3):407–441. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164
2. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Лапина Т.Л. и др. Клинические рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации и ассоциации «Эндоскопическое общество РЭНДО» по диагностике и лечению гастрита, дуоденита. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2021;31(4):70–99. DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-4-70-99. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Lapina T.L. et al. Clinical Recommendations of Russian Gastroenterological Association and RENDO Endoscopic Society on Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastritis and Duodenitis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2021;31(4):70–99 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-4-70-99
3. Neumann W.L., Coss E., Rugge M., Genta R.M. Autoimmune atrophic gastritis--pathogenesis, pathology and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(9):529–541. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.101
4. Кайбышева В.О., Тихонов С.В., Кашин С.В. и др. Алгоритм диагностики и лечения аутоиммунного гастрита. Профилактическая медицина. 2024;27(9):101–110. DOI: 10.17116/profmed202427091101. Kaibysheva V.O., Tykhonov S.V, Kashin S.V. et al. Algorithm of autoimmune gastritis diagnosis and treatment. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(9):101–110 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/profmed202427091101
5. Щелоченков С.В., Бордин Д.С., Чеботарева М.В. и др. Аутоиммунный гастрит: от диагностики к эффективной терапии. РМЖ. Медицинское обозрение. 2024;8(5):299–306. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2024-8-5-9. Shchelochenkov S.V., Bordin D.S., Chebotareva M.V. et al. Autoimmune gastritis: diagnosis to effective therapy. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2024;8(5):299–306 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2024-8-5-9
6. Щербаченя Н.А., Василенко К.В. Актуальный взгляд на проблему аутоиммунного гастрита. Российский медицинский журнал. 2025;31(1):18–29. DOI: 10.17816/medjrf641732. Shcherbachenya N.A., Vasilenko K.V. Current perspective on the problem of autoimmune gastritis. Russian Medicine. 2025;31(1):18–29 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/medjrf641732
7. Губанова А.В., Ливзан М.А., Мозговой С.И. Клинические, эндоскопические и морфологические признаки хронического аутоиммунного гастрита с учетом статуса инфицирования Helicobacter pylori. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2025;21(2):12–19. DOI: 10.33978/2307-3586-2025-21-2-12-19. Gubanova A.V., Livzan M.A., Mozgovoy S.I. Clinical, endoscopic and morphological signs of chronic autoimmune gastritis, taking into account the status of Helicobacter pylori infection. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2025;21(2):12–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33978/2307-3586-2025-21-2-12-19
8. Щелоченков С.В., Гуськова О.Н., Колбасников С.В., Бордин Д.С. Аутоиммунный гастрит: нерешенные вопросы диагностики, значение внутрипросветной эндоскопии. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2021;17(4):76–81. DOI: 10.33978/2307-3586-2021-17-4-76-81. Shchelochenkov S.V., Guskova O.N., Kolbasnikov S.V., Bordin D.S. Autoimmune gastritis: unresolved diagnostic issues, the significance of endoluminal endoscopy. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2021;17(4):76–81 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33978/2307-3586-2021-17-4-76-81
9. Губанова А.В., Ливзан М.А., Мозговой С.И., Турчанинов Д.В. Диагностика аутоиммунного гастрита у лиц с различным статусом инфицирования Нelicobacter pylori: система поддержки принятия врачебных решений. Лечащий Врач. 2025;(4):92–98. DOI: 10.51793/OS.2025.28.4.014. Gubanova A.V., Livzan M.A., Mozgovoi S.I., Turchaninov D.V. Diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis in patients with different status of Нelicobacter pylori infection: a medical decision support system. Lechaschi Vrach. 2025;(4):92–98 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.51793/OS.2025.28.4.014
10. Li M.M., Reis B.Y., Rodman A. et al. One patient, many contexts: scaling medical AI with contextual intelligence. arXiv:2506.10157. 2025. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.10157
11. Choi R.Y., Coyner A.S., Kalpathy-Cramer J. et al. Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(2):14. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.14
12. Colom R., Karama S., Jung R.E., Haier R.J. Human intelligence and brain networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(4):489–501. DOI: 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.4/rcolom
13. Miotto R., Wang F., Wang S., Jiang X. et al. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236–1246. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx044
14. Shrestha U.K. Emerging role of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology. World J Gastroenterol. 2025;31(39):111495. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i39.111495
15. Cao J.S., Lu Z.Y., Chen M.Y. et al. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: Status and challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(16):1664–1690. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i16.1664
16. Yang Y.J., Bang C.S. Application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(14):1666–1683. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i14.1666
17. Haug C.J., Drazen J.M. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1201–1208. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038
18. Okagawa Y., Abe S., Yamada M., Oda I., Saito Y. Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:1553–1572. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07086-z
19. Shi Y., Wei N., Wang K., Tao T. et al. Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy for chronic atrophic gastritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1134980. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1134980
20. Turtoi D.C., Brata V.D., Incze V. et al. Artificial Intelligence for the Automatic Diagnosis of Gastritis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4818. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164818
21. Brodeur P.G., Goh E., Tat E. et al. State of Clinical AI 2026. ARISE Network, 2026. (Electronic resource.) URL: https://arise-ai.org/report (access date: 11.05.2026).
22. Bean A.M., Payne R.E., Parsons G. et al. Reliability of LLMs as medical assistants for the general public: a randomized preregistered study. Nat Med. 2026;32(2):609–615. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-04074-y
23. Ластед Л.Б. Введение в проблему принятия решений в медицине. М.: Мир; 1971. Lusted L.B. Introduction to medical decision making. М.: Mir; 1971 (in Russ.).
24. Jamil M., Li Q. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current evidence and future directions. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2025;18:26317745251398945. DOI: 10.1177/26317745251398945
25. Chiang T.H., Hsu Y.N., Chen M.H. et al. A rural-to-center artificial intelligence model for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection and premalignant gastric conditions using endoscopy images captured in routine practice. Endoscopy. 2026;58(4):343–354. DOI: 10.1055/a-2721-6552
26. Lee Y.H., Park G., Kim J.Y. et al. Artificial intelligence assistance improves endoscopist accuracy for gastric cancer dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):12428. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-43149-9
27. Niazi M.K.K., Parwani A.V., Gurcan M.N. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):e253–e261. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8
28. Chen S., Ding P., Guo H. et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1437252. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1437252
29. Xia K., Hu Y., Cai S. et al. GastritisMIL: An interpretable deep learning model for the comprehensive histological assessment of chronic gastritis. Patterns (N Y). 2025;6(8):101286. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101286
30. Zhao Q., Jia Q., Chi T. U-Net deep learning model for endoscopic diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis and operative link for gastritis assessment staging: a prospective nested case-control study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2023;16:17562848231208669. DOI: 10.1177/17562848231208669
31. Lu M.Y., Chen B., Williamson D.F.K. et al. A visual-language foundation model for computational pathology. Nat Med. 2024;30(3):863–874. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02856-4
32. Lu M.Y., Chen B., Williamson D.F.K. et al. A multimodal generative AI copilot for human pathology. Nature. 2024;634(8033):466–473. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07618-3
33. Yoo S.Y., Hwang Y., Yun S. et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Daily Quality Control System for the Histologic Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Biopsies: A 1-Year Experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025;149(7):659–667. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0173-OA
34. Zhang K., Wang D., Lin F., Xie J., Zhou W. A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration. iScience. 2026;29(3):115026. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115026
35. Xu Q., Xie W., Liao B. et al. Interpretability of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence from Technological and Medical Perspective: A Systematic Review. J Healthc Eng. 2023;2023:9919269. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9919269
36. Hatherley J., Sparrow R., Howard M. The Virtues of Interpretable Medical AI. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024;33(3):323–332. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180122000664
37. Obuchowicz R., Piórkowski A., Nurzyńska K. et al. AI Replace Physicians in the Near Future? AI Adoption Barriers in Medicine. Diagnostics (Basel). 2026;16(3):396. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16030396

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article