Russian Medical Inquiry
(RMZh. Meditsinskoe Obozrenie) ISSN 2587-6821 (Print), 2686-9918 (Online)

Metainflammation: new horizons for the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid

VAK

Scopus

E-libraryDimensions

russian citation indexULRICHS

roaddoaj

CyberleninkaGoogle Scholar

vinitiResearch4life

MendeleyScilit

РГБWhite list




Open accessCrossrefAntiplagiat

RMJ.ru




DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2025-9-9-8

M.A. Livzan, G.R. Bikbavova, O.V. Gaus, R.A. Karimov, D.A. Gavrilenko

Omsk State Medical University, Omsk, Russian Federation

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a natural hydrophilic bile acid with established efficacy in the treatment of hepatobiliary pathology, currently represents a therapeutic agent whose clinical possibilities have been significantly reconsidered due to new data regarding its pleiotropic mechanisms of action. Contemporary research demonstrates UDCA's capacity to influence key pathogenetic links of metabolically-associated diseases through the modulation of nuclear receptors (FXR, TGR5), mitochondrial function, and the reduction of oxidative stress and systemic inflammation. Particular clinical interest lies in the use of UDCA for managing comorbid conditions unified by the phenomenon of metabolic inflammation (metainflammation): namely, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and neurodegenerative diseases. The effects of UDCA have been proven to result in the improvement of glycemic control, lipid profile, reduction in body weight, and lowering of cardiometabolic risk. Furthermore, UDCA exhibits neuroprotective potential by regulating oxidative phosphorylation and suppressing neuronal apoptosis, which opens up prospects for its application in neurology. Thus, UDCA exemplifies the successful expansion of a drug's clinical application, where a profound understanding of its molecular mechanisms of action unveils new opportunities for utilizing a long-established treatment to address critical challenges in modern medicine.

Keywords: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, metainflammation, biliary sludge, ursodeoxycholic acid, Ursofalk.

For citation: Livzan M.A., Bikbavova G.R., Gaus O.V., Karimov R.A., Gavrilenko D.A. Metainflammation: new horizons for the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2025;9(9):587–595 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2025-9-9-8

About the authors:

Maria A. Livzan — Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Rector, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Gastroenterology, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenina str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-6581-7017

Galiya R. Bikbavova — C. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy and Endocrinology, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenina str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-9252-9152

Olga V. Gaus — Dr. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Gastroenterology, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenina str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-9370-4768

Ruslan A. Karimov — 5th-year student of the Faculty of Medicine, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenina str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0009-0007-6955-2160 

Darya A. Gavrilenko — Assistant Professor of the Department of Faculty Therapy and Gastroenterology, Omsk State Medical University; 12, Lenina str., Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0001-5245-7190

Contact information: Olga V. Gaus, e-mail: gaus_olga@bk.ru

Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned.

There is no conflict of interest.

Received 27.05.2025.

Revised 23.06.2025.

Accepted 16.07.2025.

References
1. Qiao X., Ye M., Pan D.L. et al. Differentiation of various traditional Chinese medicines derived from animal bile and gallstone: simultaneous determination of bile acids by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(1):107–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.116
2. Beuers U., Boyer J.L., Paumgartner G. Ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestasis: potential mechanisms of action and therapeutic applications. Hepatology. 1998;28(6):1449–1453. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510280601
3. Eggert T., Bakonyi D., Hummel W. Enzymatic routes for the synthesis of ursodeoxycholic acid. J Biotechnol. 2014;191:11–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.08.006
4. Lindor K.D., Bowlus C.L., Boyer J. et al. Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2019;69(1):394–419. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30145
5. Bowlus C.L., Arrivé L., Bergquist A. et al. AASLD practice guidance on primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;77(2):659–702. DOI: 10.1002/hep.32771
6. Lindor K.D., Kowdley K.V., Harrison M.E.; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(5):646–660. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.112
7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on genetic cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2024;81(2):303–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.006
8. Yu X., Yang H., Qi H. Clinical Management Guidelines for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Matern Fetal Med. 2024;6(1):13–22. DOI: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000207
9. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol. 2019;70(6):1222–1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014
10. Jophlin L.L., Singal A.K., Bataller R. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(1):30–54. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002572
11. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). J Hepatol. 2024;81(3):492–542. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031
12. Fujita N., Yasuda I., Endo I. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2023;58(9):801–833. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-023-02014-6
13. Parés A., Caballería L., Rodés J. et al. Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a double-blind controlled multicentric trial. UDCA-Cooperative Group from the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2000;32(4):561–566. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80216-0
14. Mao Q., Lin B., Zhang W. et al. Understanding the role of ursodeoxycholic acid and gut microbiome in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current evidence and perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1371574. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1371574
15. Combes B., Carithers R.L. Jr, Maddrey W.C. et al. Biliary bile acids in primary biliary cirrhosis: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid. Hepatology. 1999;29(6):1649–1654. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510290618
16. Achufusi T.G.O., Safadi A.O., Mahabadi N. Ursodeoxycholic Acid. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
17. Hillaire S., Boucher E., Calmus Y. et al. Effects of bile acids and cholestasis on major histocompatibility complex class I in human and rat hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(3):781–788. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90127-9
18. Pinto C., Ninfole E., Benedetti A. et al. Involvement of Autophagy in Ageing and Chronic Cholestatic Diseases. Cells. 2021;10(10):2772. DOI: 10.3390/cells10102772
19. Carino A., Marchianò S., Biagioli M. et al. The bile acid activated receptors GPBAR1 and FXR exert antagonistic effects on autophagy. FASEB J. 2021;35(1):e21271. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202001386R
20. Wu P., Zhao J., Guo Y. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid alleviates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by inhibiting apoptosis and improving autophagy via activating AMPK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;529(3):834–838. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.128
21. Van den Bossche L., Hindryckx P., Devisscher L. et al. Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Its Taurine- or Glycine-Conjugated Species Reduce Colitogenic Dysbiosis and Equally Suppress Experimental Colitis in Mice. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(7):e02766–16. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02766-16
22. Winston J.A., Rivera A., Cai J. et al. Secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid alters weight, the gut microbiota, and the bile acid pool in conventional mice. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246161. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246161
23. Ghaffarzadegan T., Essén S., Verbrugghe P. et al. Determination of free and conjugated bile acids in serum of Apoe(-/-) mice fed different lingonberry fractions by UHPLC-MS. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3800. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40272-8
24. Li H., Wang Q., Chen P. et al. Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment Restores Gut Microbiota and Alleviates Liver Inflammation in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitic Mouse Model. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:788558. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788558
25. Winston J.A., Rivera A.J., Cai J. et al. Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) Mitigates the Host Inflammatory Response during Clostridioides difficile Infection by Altering Gut Bile Acids. Infect Immun. 2020;88(6):e00045–20. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00045-20
26. Martemucci G., Fracchiolla G., Muraglia M. et al. Metabolic Syndrome: A Narrative Review from the Oxidative Stress to the Management of Related Diseases. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(12):2091. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12122091
27. Avazova T., Rogelio P. Effects of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Inflammatory Markers IL-6 and IL-17 in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Frontiers of Global Science. 2024;2(1):12–16.
28. Зюбанова И.В., Мордовин В.Ф., Личикаки В.А. и др. Сосудистое старение: роль артериальной гипертензии, ожирения и метавоспаления. Артериальная гипертензия. 2024;30(6):553–561. DOI: 10.18705/1607-419X-2024-2474Zyubanova I.V., Mordovin V.F., Lichikaki V.A. et al. Vascular aging: the role of hypertension, obesity and meta-inflammation. Arterial Hypertension. 2024;30(6):553–561 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18705/1607-419X-2024-2474
29. Romaní-Pérez M., Líebana-García R., Flor-Duro A. et al. Obesity and the gut microbiota: implications of neuroendocrine and immune signaling. FEBS J. 2025;292(6):1397–1420. DOI: 10.1111/febs.17249
30. Winer D.A., Luck H., Tsai S., Winer S. The Intestinal Immune System in Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Cell Metab. 2016;23(3):413–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.003
31. Acosta-Martinez M., Cabail M.Z. The PI3K/Akt Pathway in Meta-Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):15330. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315330
32. Qu L., Matz A.J., Karlinsey K. et al. Macrophages at the Crossroad of Meta-Inflammation and Inflammaging. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(11):2074. DOI: 10.3390/genes13112074
33. Méndez-Sánchez N., González V., Chávez-Tapia N. et al. Weight reduction and ursodeoxycholic acid in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Hepatol. 2004;3(3):108–112.
34. Rashidbeygi E., Rasaei N., Amini M.R. et al. The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025;25(1):125. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04549-3
35. Fiorucci S., Biagioli M., Zampella A., Distrutti E. Bile Acids Activated Receptors Regulate Innate Immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1853. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01853
36. Wahlström A., Kovatcheva-Datchary P., Ståhlman M. et аl. Crosstalk between Bile Acids and Gut Microbiota and Its Impact on Farnesoid X Receptor Signalling. Dig Dis. 2017;35(3):246–250. DOI: 10.1159/000450982
37. Mueller M., Thorell A., Claudel T. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts farnesoid X receptor-antagonistic effects on bile acid and lipid metabolism in morbid obesity. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1398–1404. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.034
38. Lajczak-McGinley N.K., Porru E., Fallon C.M. et al. The secondary bile acids, ursodeoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, protect against intestinal inflammation by inhibition of epithelial apoptosis. Physiol Rep. 2020;8(12):e14456. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14456
39. Sánchez-García A., Sahebkar A., Simental-Mendía M., Simental-Mendía L.E. Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on glycemic markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Pharmacol Res. 2018;135:144–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.08.008
40. Кролевец Т.С., Ливзан М.А., Сыровенко М.И., Черкащенко Н.А. Патогенетические аспекты коморбидного течения неалкогольной жировой болезни печени и желчнокаменной болезни: обзор и собственные данные. РМЖ. Медицинское обозрение. 2022;6(5):278–285. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2022-6-5-278-285Krolevets T.S., Livzan M.A., Syrovenko M.I., Cherkashchenko N.A. Pathogenic aspects of the comorbid course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cholelithiasis: a review and the authors' results. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2022;6(5):278–285 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2022-6-5-278-285
41. Ахмедов В.А., Гаус О.В. Современные представления о механизмах развития и тактике ведения больных желчнокаменной болезнью, ассоциированной с метаболическим синдромом. Медицинский алфавит. Серия «Практическая гастроэнтерология». 2019;2(388):52–56.Akhmedov V.A., Gaus O.V. Modern concepts of the mechanisms of development and tactics of management of patients with cholelithiasis associated with metabolic syndrome. Medical alphabet. Series "Practical gastroenterology". 2019;2(388):52–56 (in Russ.).
42. Kichloo A., Solanki S., Haq K.F. et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with gallstone disease in the United States hospitalized patient population. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2021;12(2):14–24. DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v12.i2.14
43. Гаус О.В., Ахмедов В.А. Оценка прогностических факторов развития желчнокаменной болезни у лиц с метаболическим синдромом. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2014;11(111):46–50.Gaus O.V., Akhmedov V.A. Evaluation of prognostic factors for the development of cholelithiasis in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014;11(111):46–50 (in Russ.).
44. Гаус О.В., Ахмедов В.А. Влияние метаболического синдрома на состояние паренхимы печени и билиарной системы у пациентов с желчнокаменной болезнью. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2015;1(124):132–137.Gaus O.V., Akhmedov V.A. The influence of metabolic syndrome on the state of the liver parenchyma and biliary system in patients with cholelithiasis. Ural Medical Journal. 2015;1(124):132–137 (in Russ.).
45. Nadinskaia M., Maevskaya M., Ivashkin V. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid as a means of preventing atherosclerosis, steatosis and liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(10):959–975. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i10.959
46. Селиверстов П.В., Скворцова Т.Э., Ситкин С.И., Радченко В.Г. Неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени и желчнокаменная болезнь: новый взгляд на старые взаимоотношения. Фарматека. 2018;S3:68–74. DOI: 10.18565/pharmateca.2018.s3.68-74Seliverstov P.V., Skvortsova T.E., Sitkin S.I., Radchenko V.G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cholelithiasis: a new look at old relationships. Pharmateca. 2018;S3:68–74 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18565/pharmateca.2018.s3.68-74
47. Радченко В.Г., Селиверстов П.В., Леденцова С.С., Маньяков А.В. Неалкогольный стеатогепатит и билиарный сладж у лиц с метаболическим синдромом. Терапевтический архив. 2016;9:78–83.Radchenko V.G., Seliverstov P.V., Ledentsova S.S., Manyakov A.V. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and biliary sludge in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Therapeutic archive. 2016;9:78–83 (in Russ.).
48. Кучерявый Ю.А., Черемушкин С.В. Оценка терапевтической эффективности референтного препарата урсодезоксихолевой кислоты и его аналогов в растворении билиарного сладжа: метаанализ. Consilium Medicum. 2022;24(12):860–864.Kucheryavyy Y.A., Cheremushkin S.V. Therapeutic efficacy evaluation of the reference drug ursodeoxycholic acid and its analogues in the biliary sludge dissolution: a meta-analysis. Consilium Medicum. 2022;24(12):860–864 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2022.12.201429
49. Бакулин И.Г., Авалуева Е.Б., Серкова М.Ю. и др. Билиарный сладж: патогенез, этиология и лекарственная терапия. Терапевтический архив. 2021;93(2):179–186. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.02.200638Bakulin I.G., Avalueva E.B., Serkova M.U. et al. Biliary sludge: pathogenesis, etiology and drug therapy. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2021;93(2):179–186 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.02.200638
50. Jaruvongvanich V., Sanguankeo A., Upala S. Significant Association Between Gallstone Disease and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(8):2389–2396. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4125-2
51. Chávez-Talavera O., Tailleux A., Lefebvre P., Staels B. Bile Acid Control of Metabolism and Inflammation in Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(7):1679–94.e3. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.055
52. Han J., Kaufman R.J. The role of ER stress in lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(8):1329–1338. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R067595
53. Venkatesan N., Doskey L.C., Malhi H. The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum in Lipotoxicity during Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) Pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2023;193(12):1887–1899. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.08.007
54. Jungst C., Berg T., Cheng J. et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis in common chronic liver diseases. Eur J Clin Investigat. 2013;43(10):1069–1083. DOI: 10.1111/eci.12128
55. Yang Y.Y., Huang Y.T., Lee K.C. et al. Chronic administration of ursodeoxycholic acid decreases portal pressure in rats with biliary cirrhosis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2009;116(1):71–79. DOI: 10.1042/CS20080075
56. Al-Salami H., Mamo J.C., Mooranian A. et al. Long-Term Supplementation of Microencapsulated ursodeoxycholic Acid Prevents Hypertension in a Mouse Model of Insulin Resistance. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;125(1):28–32. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106084
57. Schiedermaier P., Hansen S., Asdonk D. et al. Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics. A double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Digestion. 2000;61(2):107–112. DOI::10.1159/000007742
58. Pablo Arab J., Barrera F., Arrese M. Bile Acids and Portal Hypertension. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16 Suppl 1:S83–S86. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5500
59. Mamo J.C.L., Lam V., Giles C. et al. Antihypertensive agents do not prevent blood-brain barrier dysfunction and cognitive deficits in dietary-induced obese mice. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(6):926–934. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2017.57
60. Berzigotti A., Bellot P., De Gottardi A. et al. NCX-1000, a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of UDCA, does not decrease portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalating study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(5):1094–1101. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.661
61. Thapa K., Khan H., Chahuan S. et al. Insights into therapeutic approaches for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases targeting metabolic syndrome. Mol Biol Rep. 2025;52(1):260. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10346-0
62. Zhang S., Li M., Li Y. et al. Mitochondria-targeted nanovesicles for ursodeoxycholic acid delivery to combat neurodegeneration by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):202. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03258-5
63. Yao Z., Zhang X., Zhao F. et al. Ursodeoxycholic Acid Inhibits Glioblastoma Progression via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Related Apoptosis and Synergizes with the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11(9):1337–1346. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00095
64. Krishnamurthy A., Sundaresan N., Vivekananthan G. et al. The Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled trials. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 2025;19(1):2211–2 DOI: 10.5530/ctbp.2025.1.10

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.


Previous article
Next article