Modern surgical methods for the treatment of urolithiasis
DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-3-118-122
A.G. Berezhnoy, S.S. Dunaevskaya
Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University,
Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
The article presents historical data showing the following: how methods for the treatment of urolithiasis have been developed and improved; how endoscopic equipment has been introduced and modernized; how the prevention of postoperative complications and metaphylaxis of recurrent stone formation have changed recently. Approaches to choosing the surgical treatment method depend on many individual factors (localization, concretion size and density, the presence of complicating disease factors) and are personalized. Attention to this problem is focused because of the large number of patients suffering from urolithiasis (at least 3% of the population). Modern diagnostics and treatment technologies are able to sanitize and get rid of the stone of almost any patient, as the working-age population suffers from it, as a rule — these are highly qualified specialists who are forced to be treated for a long time due to urolithiasis complications or relapse. The general social signific ance of this disease, which can haunt a person throughout life, determines the need to study the pathogenetic mechanisms of stone formation, methods of metaphylaxis and to reduce the number of invasive methods for removing urinary tract concretions, which have many dangerous complications leading to a decrease in working capacity.
Keywords: urolithiasis, kidney, surgical treatment, shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy, contact ureterolithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.
For citation: Berezhnoy A.G., Dunaevskaya S.S. Modern surgical methods for the treatment of urolithiasis. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(3):–122. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-3-118-122.
About the authors:
Aleksandr G. Berezhnoy — Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Urology, Andrology and Sexology, Institute of Postgraduate Education, Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University; 1, Partisana Zheleznyaka str., Krasnoyarsk, 660022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-7487-8671.
Svetlana S. Dunaevskaya — Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of General Surgery named after Prof. M.I. Gulman, Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University; 1, Partisana Zheleznyaka str., Krasnoyarsk, 660022, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0003-2820-4737.
Contact information: Svetlana S. Dunaevskaya, e-mail: vikto-potapenk@yandex.ru. Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned. There is no conflict of interests. Received 11.02.2021, revised 27.02.2021, accepted 15.03.2021.
2. Daudon M., Knebelmann B. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Rev. Prat. 2011;61:372–378. PMID: 21563417.
3. Rudenko V.I., Semenyakin I.V., Malkhasyan V.A., Gadzhiev N.K. Urolithiasis disease. Urologiya. 2017;2:30–63 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18565/urol.2017.2-supplement.30-63.
4. Alyaev Yu.G., Rudenko V.I., Filosofova E.V. Modern aspects of drug treatment of patients with urolithiasis. RMJ. 2004;12(8):534–540 (in Russ.).
5. Krivonos O.V., Skachkova E.I., Malkhasyan V.A., Pushkar’ D.Yu. State, problems and prospects for the development of the Russian urological service. Vestnik Rossiyskogo obshchestva urologov. 2012;2:26–32 (in Russ.).
6. Rossolovskiy A.N., Berezinets O.L., Blyumberg B.I. Urolithiasis: evolution of ideas. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsiy. 2014;4:1–16 (in Russ.).
7. Yanenko E.K., Merinov D.S., Konstantinova O.V. et al. Current trends in epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of urolithiasis. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2012;3:19–25 (in Russ.).
8. Belay S.I., Dovbysh M.A., Belay I.M. Urolithiasis: the relevance of the issue and the prospects for its development. Vestnik VGMU. Ukraina. 2016;15(5):19–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22263/2312-4156.2016.5.19.
9. Berezhnoy A.G., Vinnik Yu.S., Dunaevskaya S.S., Antyufrieva D.A. Possibilities of predicting the development of inflammatory complications of the postoperative period in patients with urolithiasis. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy. 2019;2:109–113 (in Russ.).
10. Abbott J.E., Deem S.G., Mosley N. et al. Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology Annals. 2016;8(1):70–75. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.162214.
11. Ivanov M.D., Gerasimova O.M., Galimova A.M. Modern methods of treatment of urolithiasis in the presence of large stones. Molodoy uchenyy. 2019;34(272):28–30 (in Russ.).
12. Dasaeva L.A., Shashohina S.N., Shilov E.M. Diagnostics, drug treatment and prevention of urolithiasis. Klinicheskaja medicina. 2004;82(1):21–27 (in Russ.).
13. Dzeranov N.K. Treatment of urolithiasis — complex medical problem. The quality of life. Medicina. 2005;2(9):46–51 (in Russ.).
14. Bredaм A., Ogunyemi O., Leppert J.T., Schulam P.G Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Multiple Unilateral Intrarenal Stones. Eur. Urol. 2009;55:1190–1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019.
15. Grabskij A.M. The effectiveness of extracorporeal lithotripsy in urinary calculi of various chemical composition. Eksperimental’naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2016;3:112–114 (in Russ.).
16. Dzeranov N.K., Maksimov V.A., Shaduri V.R. Dzeranov N.K., Maksimov V.A., Shaduri V.R. The choice of method and timing of kidney drainage in obstructive calculous pyelonephritis. Collection of works of the Plenum of the Scientific Society of Urologists of Uzbekistan. Tashkent. 2008:41–43 (in Russ.).
17. Ivanov M.D., Gerasimova O.M., Galimova A.M. Modern methods of treatment of urolithiasis in the presence of large stones. Molodoj uchenyj. 2019;34(272):28–30 (in Russ.).
18. Gudkov A.V., Boshhenko V.S. Retrograde contact trypsy of kidney stones, ureter and bladder. Saratovskij nauchno-medicinskij zhurnal. 2011;7(2):148 (in Russ.).
19. Eyyup S.P., Gokhan A., Bulent K. et al. Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Pre-School Age Children. Urology. 2016;3(101):21–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.039.
20. Kutluev M.M., Pulin I.L., Kruglov D.S., Rjahov A.Ya. The effectiveness of combined methods of lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Urologija. 2016;1:86–89 (in Russ.).
21. Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V., Moskalenko S.A. et al. Transurethral pyelocalycolithotripsy and lithoextraction — a new method for the treatment of kidney stones. Urologija. 2009;1:16–23 (in Russ.).
22. Gudkov A.V., Boshhenko V.S., Petlin A.V. Retrograde contact electrical impulse lithotripsy. Eksperimental’naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2011;4:49–53 (in Russ.).
23. Rogachikov V.V., Il’chenko D.N., Tevlin K.P., Kudrjashov A.V. Percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: past, present, future. Eksperimental’naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2016;2:27–36] (in Russ.).
24. Al’-Shukri S.H, Ivanov-Tjurin V.G. Place of transurethral contact ureterolithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones. Nefrologija. 2011;2:61–62 (in Russ.).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.
Распечатать