Prevalence of dry eye disease in Russia
DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2021-21-2-96-102
O.N. Onufriichuk1, A.V. Kuroyedov2,3
1G.I. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
2P.V. Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation
3Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Dry eye disease (DED) is common in the general population, and the number of patients is growing. Several risk factors including the COVID-19 pandemic and associated ubiquitous personal protective equipment (such as eye wear or face mask) wearing and distance learning and telework contribute to this process. This disease more and more affects the quality of life and labor productivity. However, the prevalence of DED in Russia is understudied while the studies vary in quantity and quality thus preventing the compilation of data and their extrapolation on the general population. This issue is further exacerbated by the lack of study coordination in a whole country and, as a result, the use of different methods and diagnostic criteria, samples of unequal age, comorbidities, region, and climatic geographical living conditions. This review paper attempts to summarize major trends and issues and to outline ways to study and solve them.
Keywords: dry eye disease, DED, prevalence, epidemiology, tear, ocular surface.
For citation: Onufriichuk O.N., Kuroyedov A.V. Prevalence of dry eye disease in Russia. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021;21(2):96–102. DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2021-21-2-96-102.
About the authors:
1Oleg N. Onufriichuk — Cand. of Sci. (Med.), ophthalmologist, ORCID iD 0000-0001-6841-3547;
2,3Aleksandr V. Kuroyedov — Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Head of the Division of Ophthalmology, ORCID iD 0000-0001-9606-0566.
1G.I. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, 64–68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196603, Russian Federation.
2P.V. Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital, 8A, Bolshaya Olenya str., Moscow, 107014, Russian Federation.
3Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1, Ostrovityanov str., Moscow, 117437, Russian Federation.
Contact information: Oleg N. Onufriichuk, e-mail: oon@inbox.ru. Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned. There is no conflict of interests. Received 05.04.2021.
References
1. Karpecki P.M. The Evolution of Dry Eye. Review of Optometry. 2015;1:79–80.
2. Leber T. Communication to the XIV congress of the German Soc. Ophthalmol. Heidelberg 1882. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 1882;20:165.
3. Lemp M.A. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21(4):221–232.
4. Behrens A., Doyle J.J., Stern L. et al.; Dysfunctional tear syndrome study group. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea. 2006;25(8):900–907. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa.
5. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75–92. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-0124 (12) 70081-2.
6. Craig J.P., Nichols K.K., Akpek E.K. et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008.
7. Fletcher R., Fletcher S., Wagner E. Clinical Epidemiology. M.: Media Sphere; 2004 (in Russ.).
8. Stapleton F., Alves M., Bunya V.Y. et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003.
9. Semenov E.K., Zaitseva N.A., Sterin A.M. et al. Climate. General characteristics. Great Russian Encyclopedia. (Electronic resource.) URL: https://bigenc.ru/physics/text/5556638 (access date: 26.03.2021) (in Russ.).
10. Birukova N.V., Nesterova N.V., Uvarov A.A. Impact of distance learning on the health of teachers, schoolchildren and students. Collection of articles of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference “The innovative trajectory of the development of modern science: formation, development, forecasts”. Petrozavodsk, 2021;149–154 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.46916/14012021-1-978-5-00174-110-7.
11. Vashchenko I.S., Koshelev P.O. Estimation of the prevalence of tunnel syndrome and dry eye syndrome in young people. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsii. 2017;7(6):819 (in Russ.).
12. Rasstriga U.I. A study of dry eye syndrome among different age groups of the population. Scientist (Russia). 2020;3(13):13 (in Russ.).
13. Tonkonogy S.V., Kolenko O.V., Vasiliev A.V. The study of the patient’s subjective perception of the state of the ocular surface structures, depending on the initial level of tear production after phacoemulsification of age-related cataract. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2019;5:148–151 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-5-148-151.
14. Tonkonogiy S.V., Bai L.U., Vasilyev A.V. Investigation of tear production dynamics in patients with age-related cataract before and after phacoemulsification. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;11(1):6–9 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV1116-9.
15. Kovalevskaya M.A., Milyutkina S.O., Bogatyreva E.S., Klepikova Yu.I. Screening methods in the program of early detection of eye diseases (glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, «dry eye» syndrome). Novosti glaukomy. 2016;1(37):109–112 (in Russ.).
16. Ostanina D.A., Korobinceva K.N. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among young persons. Vestnik Soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoi oblasti. 2018;1(1):38–41 (in Russ.).
17. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V. et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before cataract surgery. Oftal’mologiya. 2020;17(2):281–289 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-281-289.
18. Ma’ltsev D.S., Kudryashova E.V. Cyanocobalamin-containing lubricant for topical therapy of LASIK-associated dry eye. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016;132(1):68–75 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2016132168-75.
19. Zhirov K.S., Trubetskov A.D. SDry eye syndrome in students of modern educational institutions. Materials of the interregional scientific-practical conference of young scientists and specialists “Hygiene, ecology and health risks in modern conditions”. 2018:63–64 (in Russ.).
20. Ozheredov I.A., Safonova T.N., Sikach E.I. Terahertz reflectometry for evaluation ot thz stability of the tear film. Medical Physics (TKMF-7): Collection of abstracts of the VII Troitskaya Conference with international participation, Moscow, 19–21.10.2020. M.: Sechenov University. 2020:46–47 (in Russ.).
21. Chuprov A.D., Voronina A.E., Petrosyan E.A. Primary school age: prevention of visual deterioration. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018;4(216):95–100 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-216-95.
22. Efimova E.L., Brzhesky V.V., Panova I.E. et al. The effectiveness of Irifrin 2.5% and Irifrin-BK 2.5% drugs in the treatment of computer vision syndrome. Rossiyskiy oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2017;10(1):74–79 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-1-74-79.
23. Maychuk D. Yu. Prevalence and severity of dry eye syndrome in myopic candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019;135(1):74–83 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma201913501174.
24. Vashchenko I.S., Koshelev P.O. Estimation of the prevalence of tunnel syndrome and dry eye syndrome in young people. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsii. 2017;7(6):819 (in Russ.).
25. Akbarova A.V. Prevalence of “dry eye” syndrome among students of Bashkir state medical university who use soft contact lenses for myopia correction. Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2017;3:5–8 (in Russ.).
26. Zhukova E.A., Shitova O.V., Kolevatykh E.P. Changes in tear production indicators and the presence of inflammatory reactions in patients with contact vision correction. Vyatskii meditsinskii vestnik. 2017;4(56):67–70 (in Russ.).
27. Astakhov S. Yu., Riks I.A. Experience in Gilan Comfort eye drops use of in patients after excimer laser surgery. Oftal’mologicheskiye vedomosti. 2017;10(4):57–60 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV10457-60.
28. Klokova O.A., Damashauskas R.O., Geidenrich M.S. Ocular surface treatment in dry eye patients before corneal refractive surgery. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020;20(4):180–186 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-4-180-186.
29. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V. et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before refractive operations. Oftal’mologiya. 2018;15(1):92–101 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-92-101.
30. Brezhnev A. Yu., Baranov V.I., Petrov S. Yu. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome as risk factor for "dry eye" syndrome. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;16(1):30–34 (in Russ.).
31. Potemkin V.V., Ageeva E.V. Ocular surface disease in patients with involutional lower eyelid malpositions. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2016;23(3):56–59 (in Russ.).
32. Shvailikova I.E., Belikova E.I. Evaluation of the condition of the eye surface in patients with burdened general somatic history. Early diagnosis, treatment and prevention methods. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2020;4:56–62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2020-4-56-62.
33. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S. et al. Influence of local hypotensive glaucoma therapy on the development and progression of dry eye syndrome. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017;2:74–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-2-74-82.
34. Kuroyedov A.V., Nagornova Z.M., Seleznev A.V. et al. Influence of different local hypotensive therapy regimens on the development and progression of the "dry eye" syndrome. Natsional’nyj zhurnal glaukоma. 2017;16(3):71–80 (in Russ.).
35. Mal’tsev D.S., Kudryashova E.V., Kotova N.A. et al. Predictive criteria for the severity of dry eye syndrome after LASIK. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2016;5:158–159 (in Russ.).
36. Smirennaya E.V., Mityagina O.N., Rybintseva L.V. The prediction of moderate-to-severe dry eye after laser refractive surgery for myopia. Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2016;16(4):50–60 (in Russ.).
37. Aznabaev R.A., Shavaleeva K.R., Iskandarov R. Kh., Khusainova R.F. Investigation of the dynamics of changes of functional lacrimal complex in postoperative LASIK. Tochka zreniya. Vostok — Zapad. 2016;3:110–113 (in Russ.).
38. Pashtaev N.P., Kulikova I.L., Shlenskaya O.V. Features of the functional lacrimal complex in different age groups of children after keratorefractive operations. Rossiiskaya detskaya oftal’mologiya. 2016;4:5–8 (in Russ.).
39. Astakhov S. Yu, Tkachenko N.V. Trehalose efficacy in dry eye syndrome treatment after phacoemulsification. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;9(4):79–89 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV9479-89.
40. Tonkonogii S.V., Kolenko O.V., Vasiliev A.V., Pashentsev Y.E. Development and analysis of effectiveness of predictive clinical-mathematical system of development of dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification of senile cataract. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2020;2:12–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2020-2-12-19.
41. Senchenko N.Ya. Success algorithm in multifocal surgical correction of visual disturbances in patients with cataract. Collection of articles of the XVI International Research Competition. Penza, 2020:39–43 (in Russ.).
42. Alekseev I.B., Strakhov V.V., Melnikova N.V., Popova A.A. Changes in the fibrous tunic of the eye in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyj zhurnal glaukоma. 2016;15(1):13–23 (in Russ.).
43. Makashova N.V., Vasil’eva A.E., Kolosova O.Yu., Morozova N.E. Dry eye syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma without treatment. Tochka zreniya. Vostok-Zapad. 2019;2:65–67 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/2410-1257-2019-2-65-67.
44. Bubnova I.A., Egorova G.B., Averich V.V., Mitichkina T.S. Medical treatment for dry eye in patients with keratoconus after corneal cross-linking. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020;20(2):67–71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-2-67-71.
45. Eivazova K.A., Kataev M.G., Gushchina M.B. et al. The prevalence of impaired tear production in patients with pterygium. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2017;3:50–52 (in Russ.).
46. Kovalevskaya M.A., Chernikova I.V., Podoprigora V.S., Sergeeva M.I. Proteomic diagnostic technologies and their application for the refractive correction of ametropia. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2017;12(4):193–199 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18821/1993-1859-2017-12-4-193-199.
47. Zernii E. Yu., Golovastova M.O., Baksheeva V.E. et al. Alterations in tear biochemistry associated with chronic dry eye syndrome in postanesthetic period. Biokhimiya. 2017;82(1):137–148 (in Russ.).
48. Ryabtseva A.A., Grishina E.E., Andryukhina O.M. et al. The eye status in patients after new coronavirus infection. Al’manakh klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2020;48(S1):20–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-032.
49. Kuroyedov A.V., Zavadski P. Ch., Brezhnev A. Yu. et al. Influence of personal respiratory and visual protective equipment on the development and progression of dry eye syndrome. Oftal’mologiya. 2020;17(3):519–526 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3-519-526.
50. Antropova G.A., Okonenko T.I. Structure of sales of preparations “artificial treatment” in the regional market. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, dedicated to the memory of Associate Professor Peshkova V.A. “Innovative technologies in pharmacy”. FGBOU VO IGMU Minzdrava Rossii. 2018:199–204 (in Russ.).
2. Leber T. Communication to the XIV congress of the German Soc. Ophthalmol. Heidelberg 1882. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 1882;20:165.
3. Lemp M.A. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21(4):221–232.
4. Behrens A., Doyle J.J., Stern L. et al.; Dysfunctional tear syndrome study group. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea. 2006;25(8):900–907. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa.
5. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75–92. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-0124 (12) 70081-2.
6. Craig J.P., Nichols K.K., Akpek E.K. et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008.
7. Fletcher R., Fletcher S., Wagner E. Clinical Epidemiology. M.: Media Sphere; 2004 (in Russ.).
8. Stapleton F., Alves M., Bunya V.Y. et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003.
9. Semenov E.K., Zaitseva N.A., Sterin A.M. et al. Climate. General characteristics. Great Russian Encyclopedia. (Electronic resource.) URL: https://bigenc.ru/physics/text/5556638 (access date: 26.03.2021) (in Russ.).
10. Birukova N.V., Nesterova N.V., Uvarov A.A. Impact of distance learning on the health of teachers, schoolchildren and students. Collection of articles of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference “The innovative trajectory of the development of modern science: formation, development, forecasts”. Petrozavodsk, 2021;149–154 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.46916/14012021-1-978-5-00174-110-7.
11. Vashchenko I.S., Koshelev P.O. Estimation of the prevalence of tunnel syndrome and dry eye syndrome in young people. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsii. 2017;7(6):819 (in Russ.).
12. Rasstriga U.I. A study of dry eye syndrome among different age groups of the population. Scientist (Russia). 2020;3(13):13 (in Russ.).
13. Tonkonogy S.V., Kolenko O.V., Vasiliev A.V. The study of the patient’s subjective perception of the state of the ocular surface structures, depending on the initial level of tear production after phacoemulsification of age-related cataract. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2019;5:148–151 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-5-148-151.
14. Tonkonogiy S.V., Bai L.U., Vasilyev A.V. Investigation of tear production dynamics in patients with age-related cataract before and after phacoemulsification. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;11(1):6–9 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV1116-9.
15. Kovalevskaya M.A., Milyutkina S.O., Bogatyreva E.S., Klepikova Yu.I. Screening methods in the program of early detection of eye diseases (glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, «dry eye» syndrome). Novosti glaukomy. 2016;1(37):109–112 (in Russ.).
16. Ostanina D.A., Korobinceva K.N. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among young persons. Vestnik Soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoi oblasti. 2018;1(1):38–41 (in Russ.).
17. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V. et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before cataract surgery. Oftal’mologiya. 2020;17(2):281–289 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-281-289.
18. Ma’ltsev D.S., Kudryashova E.V. Cyanocobalamin-containing lubricant for topical therapy of LASIK-associated dry eye. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016;132(1):68–75 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2016132168-75.
19. Zhirov K.S., Trubetskov A.D. SDry eye syndrome in students of modern educational institutions. Materials of the interregional scientific-practical conference of young scientists and specialists “Hygiene, ecology and health risks in modern conditions”. 2018:63–64 (in Russ.).
20. Ozheredov I.A., Safonova T.N., Sikach E.I. Terahertz reflectometry for evaluation ot thz stability of the tear film. Medical Physics (TKMF-7): Collection of abstracts of the VII Troitskaya Conference with international participation, Moscow, 19–21.10.2020. M.: Sechenov University. 2020:46–47 (in Russ.).
21. Chuprov A.D., Voronina A.E., Petrosyan E.A. Primary school age: prevention of visual deterioration. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018;4(216):95–100 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-216-95.
22. Efimova E.L., Brzhesky V.V., Panova I.E. et al. The effectiveness of Irifrin 2.5% and Irifrin-BK 2.5% drugs in the treatment of computer vision syndrome. Rossiyskiy oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2017;10(1):74–79 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-1-74-79.
23. Maychuk D. Yu. Prevalence and severity of dry eye syndrome in myopic candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019;135(1):74–83 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma201913501174.
24. Vashchenko I.S., Koshelev P.O. Estimation of the prevalence of tunnel syndrome and dry eye syndrome in young people. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsii. 2017;7(6):819 (in Russ.).
25. Akbarova A.V. Prevalence of “dry eye” syndrome among students of Bashkir state medical university who use soft contact lenses for myopia correction. Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2017;3:5–8 (in Russ.).
26. Zhukova E.A., Shitova O.V., Kolevatykh E.P. Changes in tear production indicators and the presence of inflammatory reactions in patients with contact vision correction. Vyatskii meditsinskii vestnik. 2017;4(56):67–70 (in Russ.).
27. Astakhov S. Yu., Riks I.A. Experience in Gilan Comfort eye drops use of in patients after excimer laser surgery. Oftal’mologicheskiye vedomosti. 2017;10(4):57–60 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV10457-60.
28. Klokova O.A., Damashauskas R.O., Geidenrich M.S. Ocular surface treatment in dry eye patients before corneal refractive surgery. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020;20(4):180–186 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-4-180-186.
29. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V. et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before refractive operations. Oftal’mologiya. 2018;15(1):92–101 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-92-101.
30. Brezhnev A. Yu., Baranov V.I., Petrov S. Yu. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome as risk factor for "dry eye" syndrome. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;16(1):30–34 (in Russ.).
31. Potemkin V.V., Ageeva E.V. Ocular surface disease in patients with involutional lower eyelid malpositions. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2016;23(3):56–59 (in Russ.).
32. Shvailikova I.E., Belikova E.I. Evaluation of the condition of the eye surface in patients with burdened general somatic history. Early diagnosis, treatment and prevention methods. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2020;4:56–62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2020-4-56-62.
33. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S. et al. Influence of local hypotensive glaucoma therapy on the development and progression of dry eye syndrome. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017;2:74–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-2-74-82.
34. Kuroyedov A.V., Nagornova Z.M., Seleznev A.V. et al. Influence of different local hypotensive therapy regimens on the development and progression of the "dry eye" syndrome. Natsional’nyj zhurnal glaukоma. 2017;16(3):71–80 (in Russ.).
35. Mal’tsev D.S., Kudryashova E.V., Kotova N.A. et al. Predictive criteria for the severity of dry eye syndrome after LASIK. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2016;5:158–159 (in Russ.).
36. Smirennaya E.V., Mityagina O.N., Rybintseva L.V. The prediction of moderate-to-severe dry eye after laser refractive surgery for myopia. Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2016;16(4):50–60 (in Russ.).
37. Aznabaev R.A., Shavaleeva K.R., Iskandarov R. Kh., Khusainova R.F. Investigation of the dynamics of changes of functional lacrimal complex in postoperative LASIK. Tochka zreniya. Vostok — Zapad. 2016;3:110–113 (in Russ.).
38. Pashtaev N.P., Kulikova I.L., Shlenskaya O.V. Features of the functional lacrimal complex in different age groups of children after keratorefractive operations. Rossiiskaya detskaya oftal’mologiya. 2016;4:5–8 (in Russ.).
39. Astakhov S. Yu, Tkachenko N.V. Trehalose efficacy in dry eye syndrome treatment after phacoemulsification. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;9(4):79–89 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV9479-89.
40. Tonkonogii S.V., Kolenko O.V., Vasiliev A.V., Pashentsev Y.E. Development and analysis of effectiveness of predictive clinical-mathematical system of development of dry eye syndrome after phacoemulsification of senile cataract. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2020;2:12–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2020-2-12-19.
41. Senchenko N.Ya. Success algorithm in multifocal surgical correction of visual disturbances in patients with cataract. Collection of articles of the XVI International Research Competition. Penza, 2020:39–43 (in Russ.).
42. Alekseev I.B., Strakhov V.V., Melnikova N.V., Popova A.A. Changes in the fibrous tunic of the eye in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyj zhurnal glaukоma. 2016;15(1):13–23 (in Russ.).
43. Makashova N.V., Vasil’eva A.E., Kolosova O.Yu., Morozova N.E. Dry eye syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma without treatment. Tochka zreniya. Vostok-Zapad. 2019;2:65–67 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/2410-1257-2019-2-65-67.
44. Bubnova I.A., Egorova G.B., Averich V.V., Mitichkina T.S. Medical treatment for dry eye in patients with keratoconus after corneal cross-linking. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020;20(2):67–71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-2-67-71.
45. Eivazova K.A., Kataev M.G., Gushchina M.B. et al. The prevalence of impaired tear production in patients with pterygium. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2017;3:50–52 (in Russ.).
46. Kovalevskaya M.A., Chernikova I.V., Podoprigora V.S., Sergeeva M.I. Proteomic diagnostic technologies and their application for the refractive correction of ametropia. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2017;12(4):193–199 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18821/1993-1859-2017-12-4-193-199.
47. Zernii E. Yu., Golovastova M.O., Baksheeva V.E. et al. Alterations in tear biochemistry associated with chronic dry eye syndrome in postanesthetic period. Biokhimiya. 2017;82(1):137–148 (in Russ.).
48. Ryabtseva A.A., Grishina E.E., Andryukhina O.M. et al. The eye status in patients after new coronavirus infection. Al’manakh klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2020;48(S1):20–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-032.
49. Kuroyedov A.V., Zavadski P. Ch., Brezhnev A. Yu. et al. Influence of personal respiratory and visual protective equipment on the development and progression of dry eye syndrome. Oftal’mologiya. 2020;17(3):519–526 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3-519-526.
50. Antropova G.A., Okonenko T.I. Structure of sales of preparations “artificial treatment” in the regional market. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, dedicated to the memory of Associate Professor Peshkova V.A. “Innovative technologies in pharmacy”. FGBOU VO IGMU Minzdrava Rossii. 2018:199–204 (in Russ.).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.
Previous article
Next article
Распечатать