1. Liang Y.B., Friedman D.S., Zhou Q. et al. Prevalence of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in a Rural Adult Chinese Population: The Handan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8250. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7472
2. Mason R.P., Kosoko O., Wilson M.R. et al. National Survey of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Ophthalmol. 1989;96:1363–1368. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32708-4
3. Волков В.В. Глаукома при псевдонормальном давлении. М.: Медицина; 2001.Volkov V.V. Glaucoma with pseudo-normal pressure. M.: Medicine; 2001 (in Russ.).
4. Klein B.E.K., Klein R., Sponsel W.E. et al. Prevalence of Glaucoma. Ophthalmol. 1992;99:1499–1504. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31774-9
5. Shiose Y., Kitazawa Y., Tsukahara S. et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan — a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133–155.
6. Cho H., Kee C. Population-based glaucoma prevalence studies in Asians. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:434–447. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.09.003
7. Bonomi L., Marchini G., Marraffa M. et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. Ophthalmol. 1998;105:209–215. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)92665-3
8. Sommer A. Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Among White and Black Americans: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1090. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080050026
9. Петров С.Ю. Современный взгляд на глаукому нормального давления. Вестник офтальмологии. 2020;136(6):57–64. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013606157Petrov S.Yu. Modern view on normal-tension glaucoma. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2020;136(6):57–64 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013606157
10. Asefa N.G., Neustaeter A., Jansonius N.M. et al. Heritability of glaucoma and glaucoma-related endophenotypes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64:835–851. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.06.002
11. Aboobakar I.F., Wiggs J.L. The genetics of glaucoma: Disease associations, personalised risk assessment and therapeutic opportunities-A review. Clin Exper Ophthalmol. 2022;50:143–162. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14035
12. Zukerman R., Harris A., Verticchio Vercellin A. et al. Molecular Genetics of Glaucoma: Subtype and Ethnicity Considerations. Genes. 2020;12:55. DOI: 10.3390/genes12010055
13. Sarfarazi M., Child A., Stoilova D. et al. Localization of the Fourth Locus (GLC1E) For Adult-Onset Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma to the 10p15-p14 Region. Am J Human Genetics. 1998;62:641–652. DOI: 10.1086/301767
14. Chalasani M.L., Radha V., Gupta V. et al. A Glaucoma-Associated Mutant of Optineurin Selectively Induces Death of Retinal Ganglion Cells Which Is Inhibited by Antioxidants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1607. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0834
15. Liu Y.-H., Tian T. Hypothesis of optineurin as a new common risk factor in normal-tension glaucoma and Alzheimer's disease. Med Hypotheses. 2011;77:591–592. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.06.040
16. Rezaie T., Child A., Hitchings R. et al. Adult-Onset Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Caused by Mutations in Optineurin. Science. 2002;295:1077–1079. DOI: 10.1126/science.1066901
17. Tang S., Toda Y., Kashiwagi K. et al. The association between Japanese primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients and the optineurin gene. Hum Genet. 2003;113:276–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-003-0964-y
18. Aung T., Ocaka L., Ebenezer N.D. et al. A major marker for normal tension glaucoma: association with polymorphisms in the OPA1 gene. Hum Genet. 2002;110:52–56. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-001-0645-7
19. Powell B.L., Toomes C., Scott S. et al. Polymorphisms in OPA1 are associated with normal tension glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2003;9:460–464.
20. Yu-Wai-Man P., Stewart J., Hudson G. et al. OPA1 increases the risk of normal but not high tension glaucoma. J Med Genet. 2010;47:120–125. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2009.067512
21. Mabuchi F., Tang S., Kashiwagi K. et al. The OPA1 gene polymorphism is associated with normal tension and high tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:125–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.028
22. Golubnitschaja O., Yeghiazaryan K., Liu R. et al. Increased Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Mononuclear Blood Cells of Normal-Tension Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:66–72. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200402000-00013
23. Григоркевич О.С., Мокров Г.В., Косова Л.Ю. Матриксные металлопротеиназы и их ингибиторы. Фармакокинетика и Фармакодинамика. 2019;(2):3–16. DOI: 10.24411/2587-7836-2019-10040Grigorkevich O.S., Mokrov G.V., Kosova L.Yu. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. 2019;(2):3–16 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2587-7836-2019-10040
24. Кириллова М.О., Журавлева А.Н., Марахонов А.В. и др. Полиморфизмы генов, связанных с ремоделированием соединительной ткани как маркеры доклинической диагностики первичной открытоугольной глаукомы у пациентов с наследственной предрасположенностью. Медицинская генетика. 2021;20(5):26–33. DOI: 10.25557/2073-7998.2021.05.26-33Kirillova M.O., Zhuravleva A.N., Marakhonov A.V. et al. Gene polymorphisms associated with the remodeling of the connective tissue as markers of preclinical diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with hereditary predisposition. Medical Genetics. 2021;20(5):26–33 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25557/2073-7998.2021.05.26-33
25. Wolf C., Gramer E., Müller-Myhsok B. et al. Evaluation of nine candidate genes in patients with normal tension glaucoma: a case control study. BMC Med Genet. 2009;10:91. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-91
26. Ishikawa K., Yamamoto S., Hattori S. et al. Acquired expression of mutant Mitofusin 2 causes progressive neurodegeneration and abnormal behavior. J Neurosci. 2019;2139–2118. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2139-18.2018
27. Ma Y., Sun A., Zhang Y. et al. The Genotype and Phenotype Features in a Large Chinese MFN2 Mutation Cohort. Front Neurol. 2021;12:757518. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.757518
28. Guerriero S., D'Oria F., Rossetti G. et al. CMT2A Harboring Mitofusin 2 Mutation with Optic Nerve Atrophy and Normal Visual Acuity. IMCRJ. 2020;13:41–45. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S237620
29. Zhou Z.-W., Ren X., Zheng L.-J. et al. LncRNA NEAT1 ameliorate ischemic stroke via promoting Mfn2 expression through binding to Nova and activates Sirt3. Metab Brain Dis. 2022;37:653–664. DOI: 10.1007/s11011-021-00895-1
30. Pellegrini L., Scorrano L. A cut short to death: Parl and Opa1 in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1275–1284. DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402145
31. Kunová N., Havalová H., Ondrovičová G. et al. Mitochondrial Processing Peptidases—Structure, Function and the Role in Human Diseases. IJMS. 2022;23:1297. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031297
32. Takano Y., Shi D., Shimizu A. et al. Association of Toll-like Receptor 4 Gene Polymorphisms in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open-Angle, Normal-Tension, and Exfoliation Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:825–832.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.050
33. Fraenkl S.A., Golubnitschaja O., Yeghiazaryan K. et al. Differences in Gene Expression in Lymphocytes of Patients with High-tension, PEX, and Normal-tension Glaucoma and in Healthy Subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:841–849. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000306
34. Vernazza S., Oddone F., Tirendi S. et al. Risk Factors for Retinal Ganglion Cell Distress in Glaucoma and Neuroprotective Potential Intervention. IJMS. 2021;22:7994. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22157994
35. Murakami K., Meguro A., Ota M. et al. Analysis of microsatellite polymorphisms within the GLC1F locus in Japanese patients with normal tension glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2010;16:462–466. PMID: 20309402.
36. Chen Y., Hughes G., Chen X. et al. Genetic Variants Associated With Different Risks for High Tension Glaucoma and Normal Tension Glaucoma in a Chinese Population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:2595. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-16269
37. Ritch R., Darbro B., Menon G. et al. TBK1 Gene Duplication and Normal-Tension Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:544. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.104
38. Fingert J.H., Robin A.L., Stone J.L. et al. Copy number variations on chromosome 12q14 in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:2482–2494. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr123
39. Kawase K., Allingham R.R., Meguro A. et al. Confirmation of TBK1 duplication in normal tension glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2012;96:178–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.12.021
40. Quist T.S., Johnson C.A., Robin A.L. et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients With TBK1 Gene Mutations in One Large Pedigree. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;214:52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.01.017
41. Sollis E., Mosaku A., Abid A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D977–D985. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1010
42. Writing Committee for the Normal Tension Glaucoma Genetic Study Group of Japan Glaucoma Society; Meguro A., Inoko H., Ota M. et al. Genome-wide Association Study of Normal Tension Glaucoma: Common Variants in SRBD1 and ELOVL5 Contribute to Disease Susceptibility. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1331–1338.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.001
43. Zhang T., Cheng G., Deng L. et al. Silence of S1 RNA binding domain 1 represses cell growth and promotes apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8:760–774. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.10.10
44. Gibson J., Griffiths H., De Salvo G. et al. Genome-wide association study of primary open angle glaucoma risk and quantitative traits. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1083–1092. PMID: 22605921.
45. Nakano M., Ikeda Y., Tokuda Y. et al. Common Variants in CDKN2B-AS1 Associated with Optic-Nerve Vulnerability of Glaucoma Identified by Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33389. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033389
46. Wiggs J.L., Yaspan B.L., Hauser M.A. et al. Common Variants at 9p21 and 8q22 Are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Optic Nerve Degeneration in Glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002654. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002654
47. Елисеева Н.В., Пономаренко И.В., Чурносов М.И. Анализ функционального значения GWAS-значимого для первичной открытоугольной глаукомы полиморфизма гена CDKN2B-AS1 (in silico исследование). Вестник офтальмологии. 2021;137(4):43–50. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113704143 Eliseeva N.V., Ponomarenko I.V., Churnosov M.I. Analysis of the functional role of polymorphism in the CDKN2B-AS1 gene GWAS-significant for primary open-angle glaucoma (an in-silico study). Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2021;137(4):43–50 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113704143
48. Rathi S., Danford I., Gudiseva H.V. et al. Molecular Genetics and Functional Analysis Implicate CDKN2BAS1-CDKN2B Involvement in POAG Pathogenesis. Cells. 2020;9:1934. DOI: 10.3390/cells9091934
49. Chen Y., Lin Y., Vithana E.N. et al. Common variants near ABCA1 and in PMM2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1115–1119. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3078
50. Gharahkhani P., Burdon K.P., Fogarty R. et al. Common variants near ABCA1, AFAP1 and GMDS confer risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1120–1125. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3079
51. Bailey J.N.C., Loomis S.J., Kang J.H. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2 and FOXC1 as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016;48:189–194. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3482
52. Choquet H., Paylakhi S., Kneeland S.C. et al. A multiethnic genome-wide association study of primary open-angle glaucoma identifies novel risk loci. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2278. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04555-4
53. Shiga Y., Akiyama M., Nishiguchi K.M. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies seven novel susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:1486–1496. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy053
54. Kim Y.W., Kim Y.J., Cheong H.S. et al. Exploring the Novel Susceptibility Gene Variants for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in East Asian Cohorts: The GLAU-GENDISK Study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:221. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57066-7
55. Gharahkhani P., Jorgenson E., Hysi P. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1258. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20851-4
56. Springelkamp H., Iglesias A.I., Mishra A. et al. New insights into the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma based on meta-analyses of intraocular pressure and optic disc characteristics. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(2):438–453. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw399