Clinical Ophthalmology.
People Policies Reception of articles Other

Association of hepatobiliary pathology and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abstract

DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-6-404-412

A.N. Kazyulin, A.Yu. Goncharenko, I.E. Kalyagin

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow,
Russian Federation

The problem of comorbidity with a high risk of polypragmasia is relevant in a large group of patients with diseases in the digestive system. Currently, the problem of comorbidity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) attracts the attention of specialists due to the high disease prevalence and data indicating its association with other digestive system diseases, primarily of the hepatobiliary system. The article presents the results of clinical and experimental studies revealing the pathogenetic connections of GERD and hepatobiliary pathology accompanied by biliary dyskinesia, factors leading to an impairment of the duodenal propulsive activity. It is noted that the most important components of the esophageal mucosa lesion in duodenogastroesophageal reflux are bile acids, lysolecithin and pancreatic enzymes. The relevance of prescribing drugs that can affect the course of pathogenetically related diseases, which can significantly reduce the risk of polypragmasia, is justified. Such drugs include ursodeoxycholic acid, which, in the conditions of the GERD and hepatobiliary pathology association, contributes to the functional state normalization of the liver and biliary tract, reduces biliary dyskinesia, the severity of duodenal hypertension and duodenogastroesophageal reflux. The next example is the rebamipide cytoprotector, which has a multilateral protective effect against the mucous membrane of the GIT, including the esophagus, gastroduodenal zone, small intestine, as well as liver. The expediency of prescribing rebamipide to patients who are refractory to therapy with proton pump inhibitors is justified.

Keywords: comorbidity, hepatobiliary pathology, gast roesophageal reflux disease, ursodeoxycholic acid, rebamipid, proton pump inhibitors.

For citation: Kazyulin A.N., Goncharenko A.Yu., Kalyagin I.E. Association of hepatobiliary pathology and gastroesophageal  reflux disease. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(6):404–412 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-6 - 404-412.

Aknowledgement

The authors and the Editorial Board are grateful to Alium JSC for providing the full texts of foreign articles required for the assistance of this publication.

About the authors:

Alexander N. Kazyulin — Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-0327-4280.

Alexandra Yu. Goncharenko — C. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-5483-9325.

Igor E. Kalyagin — C. Sc. (Med.), Assistant of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation; ORCID iD 0000-0002-3407-5372.

Contact information: Alexander N. Kazyulin, e-mail: alexander.kazyulin@yandex.ru.

Financial Disclosure: no authors have a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned.

There is no conflict of interests.

Received 27.07.2021.

Revised 16.08.2021.

Accepted 30.08.2021.

References
1. Lazebnik L.B., Vertkin A.L., Konev Yu.V. et al. Aging: a professional medical approach: a national guide. M.: Eksmo; 2014 (in Russ.).
2. Lazebnik L.B., Konev Yu.V. Historical features and semantic difficulties of using the terms denoting multiplicity of diseases in one patient. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):4–9 (in Russ.).
3. Shcherbenkov I.М., Staseva I.V. Multimorbid patient: gastro-esophageal reflux disease in focus. Consilium Medicum. 2018;20(8):24–31 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.8.24-31.
4. Lazebnik L.B. Polymorbidity in the elderly. Serdtse. 2007;7:25–27 (in Russ.).
5. Lovell M. Caring for the elderly: Changing perceptions and attitudes. J Vasc Nursing. 2006:24(1):22–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2005.11.001.
6. Drossman D.A., Hasler W.L. Rome IV — Functional GI disorders: disorders of Gut-Brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1262–1279. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035.
7. Andreyev D.N., Zaborovsky A.V., Trukhmanov A.S. et al. Evaluation of the functional gastrointestinal diseases concept from standpoints of Rome IV (2016) diagnostic criteria (review). Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2017;27(1):4–11 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2017-27-1-4-11.
8. Maev I.V., Gulenchenko Yu.S., Andreev D.N. et al. Duodenogastric reflux: clinical significance and approaches to therapy. Consilium Medicum. 2014;8:5–8 (in Russ.).
9. Dzhulaĭ G.S., Sekareva E.V., Chervinets V.M. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with duodenogastroesophageal reflux in patients with biliary pathology: The specific features of the course and esophagogastroduodenal microbial biocenosis. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2014;86(2):17–22 (in Russ.).
10. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I.V., Trukhmanov A.S. et al. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(4):70–97 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-4-70-97.
11. Uspenskiy Yu.P., Fominykh Yu.A., Gnutov A.A. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: current state of issue. Medical alphabet. 2020;(37):11–15 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33667/2078-5631-2020-37-11-16.
12. Morton J.M., Bowers S.P., Lucktong T.A. et al. Gallbladder function before and after fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(6):806–810. DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00087-2.
13. Izbeki F., Rosztoczy A.I., Yobuta J.S. et al. Increased Prevalence of Gallstone and Impaired Gallbladder Motility in Patients with Barrett,s Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:2268–2275. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0126-5.
14. Morrow D.H., Avissar N.E., Toia L. et al. Pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus: Bile acids inhibit the Notch signaling pathway with induction of CDX2 gene expression in human esophageal cells. Surgery. 2009;146(4):714–722. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.050.
15. Kunsch S., Neesse A., Huth J. et al. Increased Duodeno-Gastro-Esophageal Reflux (DGER) in Symptomatic GERD Patients with a History of Cholecystectomy. Z Gastroenterol. 2009;47:744–748. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109176.
16. Fujikawa Y., Tominaga K., Fujii H. et al. High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with serum levels of triglyceride and cholesterol but not simple visceral obesity. Digestion. 2012;86(3):228–237. DOI: 10.1159/000341418.
17. Catanzaro R., Calabrese F., Occhipinti S. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(8):1939–1945. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3113-7.
18. Sun D., Wang X., Gai Z. et al. Bile acids but not acidic acids induce Barrett’s esophagus. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(2):1384–1392. PMID: 25973022.
19. Wijarnpreecha K., Panjawatanan P., Thongprayoon C. et al. Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(6):311–317. DOI: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_161_17.
20. Hashimoto N. Effects of bile acids on cyclooxygenase-2 expression in a rat model of duodenoesophageal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(21):6541–6546. DOI: 10.3748/WJG.V20.I21.6541.
21. Min Y.W., Kim Y., Gwak G.-Y. et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the development of reflux esophagitis: A cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(5):1053–1058. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14042.
22. Xue J., Xin H., Ren N. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease increases the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49:13158. DOI: 10.1111/eci.13158.
23. Tack J. Review article: role of pepsin and bile in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(1):48–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02609.x.
24. Dixon M.F., Neville P.M., Mapstone N.P. et al. Bile reflux gastritis and Barrett’s oesophagus: further evidence of a role for duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux? Gut. 2001;49:359–363. DOI: 10.1136/gut.49.3.359.
25. Bueverov A.O., Lapina E.L. Duodenogastric reflux as a cause of reflux esophagitis. Farmateca. 2006;1:1–5 (in Russ.).
26. Osadchuk A.M., Davydkin I.L., Palushkina M.G. Refractory form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Topical and open issues of conservative therapy. Medical almanac. 2012;1:29–34 (in Russ.).
27. Maksimov V.A., Chernyshev A.L., Tarasov K.M., Neronov V.A. Biliary insufficiency. M.: Adamant; 2008 (in Russ.).
28. Gubergrits N.B., Kazyulin A.N. Metabolic pancreatology. Donetsk: LLC "Lebed"; 2011 (in Russ.).
29. Kawabea A., Shimada Y., Soma T. et al. Production of prostaglandin E 2 via bile acid is enhanced by trypsin and acid in normal human esophageal epithelial cells. Life Sciences. 2004;75:21–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.11.022.
30. Zhang R., Gong J., Wang H., Wang L. Bile salts inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of cultured human normal esophageal mucosal epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(41):6466–6471. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i41.6466.
31. Liu T., Zhang X., So C.-K. et al. Regulation of Cdx2 expression by promoter methylation, and effects of Cdx2 transfection on morphology and gene expression of human esophageal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28(2):488–496. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgl176.
32. McQuaid K.R., Laine L., Fennerty M.B. et al. Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:146–165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04709.x.
33. Dzhulay G.S., Mikhaylova E.S., Dzhulay T.E., Samoukina A.M. Microbiocenosis of upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with gastroesophageal refl ux disease, associated with biliary pathology. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017;(6):9–14 (in Russ.).
34. Dzhulay G.S., Bazhenov D.V., Chervinets V.M. et al. Morphological features and esophago-gastroduodenal zone microbiocenose in patients with syndrome postcholecystectomic syndrome. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2011;9:30–35 (in Russ.).
35. Tilg H., Moschen A.R., Evolution of inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology. 2010;52(5):1836–1846. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24001.
36. Bueverova E.L., Drapkina O.M., Ivashkin V.T. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia: therapeutic possibilities of an internist. Russian medical news. 2014;XIX(3):28–36 (in Russ.).
37. Kazyulin A.N. Potentials for the early prophylaxis of progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the practice of clinicists. Farmateka. 2017;2(335):63–70 (in Russ.).
38. Buyeverov A.O., Bogomolov P.O. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: substantiation of pathogenic therapy. Klinicheskiye perspektivy gastroenterologii, gepatologii. 2009;1:3–9 (in Russ.).
39. Wigg A.J., Robert-Thompson J.G., Dymock R.B. The role small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal permeability, endotoxaemia and tumor necrosis factor-alfa in a pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut. 2001;48:206–211. DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.2.206.
40. Karpen S.J., Arrese M. Nuclear receptors, inflammation and liver disease: insights for cholestatic and fatty liver diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(4):473–478. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.2.
41. Bogomolov P.O., Shulpekova Yu.O. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Klinicheskiye perspektivy gastroenterologii, gepatologii. 2004;3:20–27 (in Russ.).
42. Cesaro C., Tiso A., Del Prete A. et al. Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(6):431–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.10.015.
43. Gravirovskaya N.G., Mosiychuk L.N., Oshmyanskaya N.Yu., Petishko O.P. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional disorders of the biliary tract. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2016;1:45–49 (in Russ.).
44. Sabbaghian M.S., Rich B.S., Rothenberger G.D. et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes and gallbladder characteristics in patients with biliary dyskinesia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(8):1324–1330. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0546-3.
45. Nehra D., Howell P., Williams C.P. et al. Toxic bile acids in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: influence of gastric acidity. Gut. 1999;44:598–602. DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.5.598.
46. Dzhulay G.S., Sekareva E.V., Chernin V.V. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and connective tissue dysplasias in terms of premorbidity and comorbidity Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2016;(2):118–118a (in Russ.).
47. Vaezi M.F., Richter J.E. Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1192–1199. DOI: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8898632.
48. Monaco L, Brillantino A., Torelli F. et al. Prevalence of bile reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients not responsive to proton pump inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(3):334–338. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.334.
49. Freedman J., Ye W., Naslund E. et al. Association between cholecystectomy and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 2001;121:548–553. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.27217.
50. Oganov R.G., Simanenkov V.I., Bakulin I.G. et al. Comorbidities in clinical practice. Algorithms for diagnostics and treatment. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2019;18(1):5–66 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2019-1-5-66.
51. Mayev I.V., Kucheryavyy Yu.A., Morozov S.V. et al. The impact of the ursodeoxycholic acid as monotherapy and in the combination with the lactulose on the biochemical blood tests values of the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients. The Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2013;23(1):37–51 (in Russ.).
52. Bueverov A.O. Approaching the moment of truth... Effective pharmacotherapy. 2015;37:34–36 (in Russ.).
53. Kazyulin A.N., Shestakov V.A., Goncharenko A.Yu. et al. Practice and prospects of clinical application of ursodeoxycholic acid preparations. RMJ. Medical Review. 2018;26(3):45–52.
54. Xiang Z., Chen Y.P., Ma K.F. et al. The role of ursodeoxycholic acid in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:140. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-140.
55. Nascimbeni F., Pais R., Bellentani S. et al. From NAFLD in clinical practice to answers from guidelines. J. Hepatol. 2013;59(4):859–871. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.05.044.
56. Mueller M., Thorrel A., Claudel T. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts farnesoid X receptorantagonistic effects on bile acid and lipid metabolism in morbid obesity. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1398–1404. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.034.
57. Maqoulitios D.E., Tasiopoulos V.S., Svokos K.A. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of gallstone formation after bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):3021–3030. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2924-y.
58. Simental-Mendía M., Sánchez-García A., Simental-Mendía L.E. Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(8):1476–1488. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14311.
59. Urdoksa®. Instructions for the use of a medicinal product for medical use (Electronic resource.) URL: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=8dc5dd25–9407–4cec-a28a-5fc406535f7candt= (access date: 07.06.2021) (in Russ.).
60. Simanenkov V.I., Lutaenko E.A. Methodical recommendations for the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (Urdoks) in patients with biliary dyskinesias. SPb.: Pharmproject; 2010 (in Russ.).
61. Martynov A.I., Sheptulin A.A., Mayev I.V. et al. New Prospects of Cytoprotection in the Treatment and Prevention of Gastric and Intestinal Diseases (Resolution of an Expert Council and Literature Review). Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(2):7–14 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-2-7-14.
62. Zvyaglova M.Y., Knyazev O.V., Parfenov A.I. Pharmacological and clinical feature of rebamipide: new therapeutic targets. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2020;92(2):104–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.02.000569.
63. Yoshida N., Kamada K., Tomatsuri N. et al. Management of recurrence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: synergestic effect of rebamipide with 15 mg lanxoprazole. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(12):3393–3398. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1166-9.
64. Hong S.J., Park S.H., Moon J.S. et al. The benefits of combination therapy with esomeprazole and rebamipide in symptom improvement in reflux esophagitis: An international multicenter study. Gut Liver. 2016;10(6):910–916. DOI: 10.5009/gnl15537.
65. Zakaria S., El-Sisi A. Rebamipide retards CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats: Possible role for PGE2. J Immunotoxicol. 2016;13(4):453–462. DOI: 10.3109/1547691X.2015.1128022.
66. Hong K.W., Kim K.E., Rhim B.Y. et al. Effect of rebamipide on liver damage and increased tumor necrosis factor in a rat model of endotoxin shock. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(9 Suppl):154S–159S. PMID: 9753243.
67. Gendy A.M., Abdallah D.M., El-Abhar H.S. The potential curative effect of rebamipide in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2017;390(7):691–700. DOI: 10.1007/s00210-017-1370-7.
68. Report on the results of a clinical study according to protocol No. 2806/17 (version 1.0 of 06/21/2017) "Study of the comparative pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of Gastrostat and the reference drug Rebagit. (Electronic resource.) URL: https://clinline.ru/reestr-klinicheskih-issledovanij/549–18.10.2017.html. (access date: 07.06.2021) (in Russ.).

License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License.
Read the article in PDF in Russian


Previous article
Next article
Are proton pump inhibitors close or dist...
0
71480
Feasibility of an integrated approach to...
0
4730
All articles

Распечатать